RE: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-19 Thread Niel Ritchie
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Richard Chandler > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2001 2:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food > > > Are we really suggesting a

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-19 Thread Annie Young
Being a person who helped organize food co-ops in the mid-70's and 80's let me start by saying that the growth of the co-ops to these new fancy updated stores was an outgrowth of two issues: a) cooperative ownership and the stores being owned by their members and b) serving good, wholesome, natur

RE: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-19 Thread Richard Chandler
Are we really suggesting a return to totally organic food production? Which billion people did you want to starve? The crop yield from organic processes just will not keep everyone fed. Plus the low yields mean that far fewer people are free to work in other areas like medicine, manufacturing,

[Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-19 Thread Ross Kaplan
"The Hudson Institute is a right wing think tank, funded by corporations, that produces a great deal of light academic, often poorly documented "research" with a very good PR function . . ." "[Organic food] also precludes the use of growth promoting hormones and antibiotics in the industrial p

RE: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-18 Thread Niel Ritchie
Connie Sheppard wades into deep organic waters with: > We've gotten some reliable testimony as to the fallacy of > that from a nutritional standpoint... We did? Okay, let's assume that we did. The benefit with organics is not that it affects nutrition, per se, but that it avoids the use and re

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-17 Thread constance13
One whole side of this discussion has been predicated on the assumption that so-called organic foods are "healthier" than the mainstream alternative. We've gotten some reliable testimony as to the fallacy of that from a nutritional standpoint... now allow me to explain why it's fallacious from a

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread jon kelland
--- DeWayne Townsend <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The point of J. Ostrow post was that the nutrient > content of > Organic and "standard operating procedure" grown > broccoli, > potatoes, carrots is the same. I think the point that is not being made very well is that although the nutritional co

[Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread Ross Kaplan
"Mr. Kaplan asks for any reason not serve organic foods in the Mpls School? How about COST as a major reason . . . I have no idea what the actual food cost is for MPS but I would venture to guess that there isn't much room for increased costs." --Julie Mattson Ostrow, MS, RD, LD; Windom Park

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread loki anderson
Julie's response did not address budgetary concerns only, Andy. She mentioned that organic foods are not inherently nutritionally inferior to the foods currently being served to the MPLS student body ("inorganic" foods?). To whit: "...As a dietitian, I may also address a common misconception

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread DeWayne Townsend
Andy > It's a sad day when the nutrition of school children - already > under fire for the fat and sugar content shoved down their throats > - should take a back seat to budget - and by a nutritionist, no > less. Help. The point of J. Ostrow post was that the nutrient content of Organic and "st

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread Andy Driscoll
To: "Ross Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, " Issues Minneapolis" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food > > I feel like I may be wearing out my welcome. I haven't been this > visible on the list before. However, this p

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread j burns
Yeah, and I heard they serve one HECK of a schnitzengrueben. JBurns Cleveland >From: Ross Kaplan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food >Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:48:12 -0800 (PST) > >"[Last August] the

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-16 Thread jmostrow
I feel like I may be wearing out my welcome. I haven't been this visible on the list before. However, this posting caught my eye and I felt I had to respond. Mr. Kaplan asks for any reason not serve organic foods in the Mpls School? How about COST as a major reason. In my "real, non-

Re: [Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-15 Thread Fredlud
Is Channel 1 being used in the MPLS public school system at all? I have not been able to get a definitive answer. Tom Taylor Sheridan Neighborhood ___ Minneapolis Issues Forum - Minnesota E-Democracy Post messages to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe, Unsub

[Mpls] Mpls. Schools & Organic Food

2001-02-15 Thread Ross Kaplan
"[Last August] the Minneapolis City Council passed a resolution condemning genetically engineered food and asks the city, including the School Board to consider purchasing Organic Food. The first meeting to push for this to become a reality in Minneapolis Schools is Thursday, February 22th at the