Re: [Mpls] Re: Time for Mpls Civilian Review to start doing its job!

2003-10-28 Thread MWeinbeck
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Mpls] Re: Time for Mpls Civilian Review to start doing its job! 10/27/2003 07:46

Re: [Mpls] Re: Time for Mpls Civilian Review to start doing its job!

2003-10-28 Thread Michelle Gross
Garrity refers to a legal case in which it was ruled that police officers are compelled by law to testify to CRA, Internal Affairs and other quasi-courts but, in exchange, that testimony cannot be used against them in actual court hearings. I wasn't on the list back when I chaired the Outcomes

Re: [Mpls] Re: Time for Mpls Civilian Review to start doing its job!

2003-10-27 Thread WizardMarks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can see the proposed rules here: http://www.ci.minneapolis.mn.us/news/20030924CRArules.asp WM: I read through all the rules and have questions around two issues: first, what is a "Garrity Warning"? It appears to be a warning to elicit the truth from police office

[Mpls] Re: Time for Mpls Civilian Review to start doing its job!

2003-10-27 Thread MWeinbeck
As a current member of the Civilian Review Authority board, I couldn't agree more with Ken Bradley's sentiment. Ken correctly notes that the Minneapolis Civilian Police Review Authority has not heard a case in a year and a half. Actually, I understand that it has been 21 months since a case was