I appreciate the efforts of both Ken and Chris to detail the issues regarding the
proposal. I would like one thing
clarified, please. I thought that hydroelectric power was first produced across the
river on the 'St. Anthony' side and
that the Minneapolis side was only mechanical hydro powe
Chris writes:
> Part 1 of 2 (the list is just restrictive on my prolixity! :-)
Sorry - been meaning to inform list members about this
The server restricts posts to about 10 kb (in Unix measurements - it works
out to about 25-30 kb per message on my PC).
While it has the salutary effect of l
Part 2 of 2
Ken Bradley wrote:
Main opposition points vs Crown's Hydro Project
include
2. Aesthetic flows over the falls/spillway. A minimum
of 2000 cu. ft /sec was established in 1993 as a
minimum. The Crown Hydro folks support this as a
permanent standard.
Only 50% of the time in a given year i
