mocratic. . .
>
> Jim McGreevy
> Downtown Minneapolis
>
> -Original Message-
> From: David Shove [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 7:41 PM
> To: Alan Hooker
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Mpls] Re: Multi-Party e
Jim,
I think that multi - party endorsement may be one tool to help build a healthier
multi party democracy here in Minneapolis. This might be especially true if
voters could indicate party choice along with the candidate choice.
Could you share with us how it works in New York?
thanks,
Cam
r 17, 2002 7:41 PM
To: Alan Hooker
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Re: Multi-Party endorsement
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Alan Hooker wrote:
>
> Thus, what is so strange about someone being endorsed by the DFL
> (itself a fusion of 3 political groups circa 19
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Alan Hooker wrote:
>
> Thus, what is so strange about someone being endorsed by the DFL (itself a
> fusion of 3 political groups circa 1940's) and the Green Party
> simultaneously?
It would be all one way. I believe the DFL has a rule forbidding
endorsement of other parties.
: "David Brauer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Mpls] Re: Multi-Party endorsement
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 13:58:51 -0600
Greg A., esq. writes:
> As interpreted by the city, a candidate cannot use the 3 words to
> identify more than one political party. &q
Greg A., esq. writes:
> As interpreted by the city, a candidate cannot use the 3 words to
> identify more than one political party. "DFL/Republican" is out of
> bounds - a candidate can list only one party, DFL or Republican.
Hmm...it appears fushion IS prohibited, by bureaucratic fiat if not ac
On Tuesday, December 17, 2002, at 02:01 AM, Tim Bonham wrote:
I could imagine a candidate who would be supported by
local Green, DFL, and GOP voters. Why should they not
get all three endorsements?
. . .
- Jason goray, Sheridan, NE.
Because Minnesota law prohibits this.
I must disagree
