Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton polling (also Fundraiser Watch)

2001-02-17 Thread Evan Schnell
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Eva Young wrote: > I've never liked these polls much, because they usually don't describe the > issues I'd like to see addressed. I think they should have put "avoiding > rediculous subsidy/debt" Or maybe: Read My Lips, No New Boondoggles. > The point of this polling is

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton polling (also Fundraiser Watch)

2001-02-17 Thread Eva Young
The thing I find ironic about this paid polling, is why isn't Sayles Belton attracting volunteers for this? I've never liked these polls much, because they usually don't describe the issues I'd like to see addressed. I think they should have put "avoiding rediculous subsidy/debt" Or maybe: R

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton polling (also Fundraiser Watch)

2001-02-17 Thread Rosalind Nelson
At 12:17 PM 2/17/01 -0600, ferma001 wrote: >BTW, how do we know the poll is a Sharon Sayles Belton campaign committee activity. Sharon is a very sharp politico and would know instantly how dangerous such an activity would be. Russell Peterson: >In answer to David's question, at the end of the

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton polling (also Fundraiser Watch)

2001-02-17 Thread ferma001
A supplemental point. St Cloud is outside the metro calling area, so the calls are subject to a long distance charge (unless a special 612, 763, 952, or 651 number was set up). The pollers could get a bigger bang for their buck by bringing the activity into town. BTW, how do we know the pol

RE: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling

2001-02-16 Thread McDonald, Lisa M
? Lisa McDonald aka Michelle McDonald the other Mayoral wannabe Tenth Ward Council Member > -Original Message- > From: Karen Forbes [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 10:57 PM > To: Russell Wayne Peterson; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling

2001-02-16 Thread Eva Young
Speaking of polling, I saw a poll on TV last night--which as I recall said 69% said she was performing poorly as mayor. Not good. I was looking for this poll on the Strib and Pioneer Press website, but couldn't find it. Did anyone else see that report? It was channel 4, 5 or 9. The other

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling

2001-02-16 Thread Sara Strzok
a better polling company. Sara Strzok Tangletown - Original Message - From: Erik Riese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 11:41 PM Subject: Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling > > Please help me understand because I'm youn

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling

2001-02-16 Thread KHarley471
I have not yet undergone this polling experience, BUT-- guess which mayoral candidate was the only one to contact me personally about my recent, admittedly chump-change gripe about access to City Hall files, and to listen (presumably with a straight face) to my thoughts and ideas about larger p

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling

2001-02-15 Thread Erik Riese
I'm going to have to use up both my posts for today: First, this message from Russ really interested me because I got the same polling call. They didn't ID themselves as working for Sharon, they said a name like "Decision Research Associates" or something. I'm deaf the right ear so - of course I

Re: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling

2001-02-15 Thread Karen Forbes
- Original Message - From: "Russell Wayne Peterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 7:58 PM Subject: [Mpls] Sayles Belton Polling > I got a call tonight from the Sayles Belton hired gun pollster. Here were > their questions: Thanks for the