At 09:58 AM 11/11/2000 -0600, you wrote:
>No one has posted because no one is surprised regarding the repolling
>editorial. I believe most Star Tribune readers believe the Star Tribune is
>the most liberal or one of the most liberal newspapers in the country. I am
>sure the Star Tribune people wou
led, would agree
> that the Florida precints should be repolled. Bill Dooley (Ward 13)(Kenny).
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, November 10, 2000 10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: N
000 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Newspaper endorsement scorecard
> I'm surprised no one has posted anything on the Strib's stunning Thursday
> editorial, where they recommended "repolling" the Florida voters confused
by
> the original butterfly ballot. If this isn't a case of
Steve Minn
--
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Newspaper endorsement scorecard
>Date: Fri, Nov 10, 2000, 10:39 PM
>
> I'm surprised no one has posted anything on the Strib's stunning Thursday
&g
I'm surprised no one has posted anything on the Strib's stunning Thursday
editorial, where they recommended "repolling" the Florida voters confused by
the original butterfly ballot. If this isn't a case of reasoned analysis
being blinded by "liberal" bias, what is? To my knowledge, no other new
>Following is the distribution data by party designation of candidates in
>tomorrows election as endorsed and published by the Minneapolis StarTribune
>and by the St. Paul Pioneer Press:
>
>Minneapolis StarTribune:
>-- endorsed Democrats= 77%
>-- endorsed Republicans = 18%
>-- endorsed Indep
gic Development
835 Linwood Ave.
St. Paul, MN 55105
651-293-9039
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: "Steve Brandt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2000 10:41:18 -0600
> To: "Multiple recipients of list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&g
This message comes on the heals of the StarTrib reporting that the city is
heading for a major budget problem. Just take a look at the group of people
(democrats) that have been in control and created the problem.
Keep this in mind when hearing the endorsements, and making your choices
Tuesday.
I
al Message-
From: Alan Shilepsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 2:35 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: RE newspaper endorsement scorecard
Steve Brandt suggests
Steve Brandt suggests (see below) that press veterans Gene Lahammer and
Betty Wilson are doing the heavy lifting (research) that results in the
Stribe's editorial decisions. I wonder how much and what kind of
research goes into the paper's endorsement decisions. I remember that
when I was interv
how do i get off this list ?
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:06 AM
Subject: Newspaper endorsement scorecard
> Following is the distribution data by party designation of candidates in
> t
You might also note that the percentage of democrats and republicans in
Minneapolis probably mirrors the endorsement percentages. I know the
republicans in my ward could hold a meeting in a phone booth--if there were
phone booths anymore.
Wizard Marks, Central
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Followi
Or, just maybe, the Democrates are, 77% of the time, the better choice. The
stats really tell us nothing.
Bruce Anderson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Blaine, MN
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 06, 2000 10:07 AM
> To: Multiple recip
And todays' lesson is? Although this is editorial page data, don't
assume the Strib is an unbiased, objective newspaper.
Bob Schoonover
Afton MN
A more apt lesson would be to not assume that the Strib has an
unbiased, objective EDITORIAL PAGE. News and editorial are separate
departments. Labe
14 matches
Mail list logo
