Yep Fitted nicely in the deleted items bin.
-Original Message-
From: Tim Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2004 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Yet another nuisance. Standard Bank's mailmarshal.
Anybody else getting mailmarshal messages from Stand
Anybody else getting mailmarshal messages from Standard Bank in South
Africa?
This email and any attachments may contain privileged and confidential information and
are intended for the named addressee only. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify the sender and delete this e-ma
Nifty idea indeed. Need to clear the blockage about RFH2's being MQSI
centric.
Regards
Tim A
-Original Message-
From: marty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 6 October 2004 10:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Clustering w/ Message Affinity
FWIW, I've found an MQRFH2 hea
FWIW, I've found an MQRFH2 header a useful place to store metadata while
the payload can be binary. Since the name/value info is user-defined,
extensible, and converted by a qmgr as necessary it could be of use in
this scenario. i.e. it can be of great use when you wish to send
textual meta-data
Title: Message
Ooops
missed the obvious. Different messages same queue as per previous email. As for
your concern about indexing unless you are talking about many thousands of
messages being backed up you shouldn't experience serious
overheads.
Regards
Tim
A
-Original Message-From:
Title: Message
If you
combine binary and text data in a single message you may have to write your own
data conversion exit if you plan to cross platforms.
Scott
-Original Message-From: MQSeries List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim
ArmstrongSent: Tuesday, Octobe
Then
maybe one message. Meta-data first and blob second. Unfortunately
MQOO_BIND_ON_OPEN only works for the queue being opened so it still doesn't
solve the two queues problem you are currently facing.
Regards
Tim
A
-Original Message-From: Jim Ford
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: W
Title: Message
Jim,
Why
don't you design the message so that it has both data components in it (string
and binary data) and use a workload exit to have multiple instances running
or across a cluster, or even dimpler just have multiple clients trigger off the
one queue so that the load is m
There was a short thread recently between Peter and Bobbee concerning
the ReplyToQueue for the PS Adapter. I chimed in with a question about
whether, if an error occurs with the Component Interface, the PS
Adapter includes that CI error in the message sent to the FAULTQ.
Collective experience sai
Thanks to both of you for looking at
this. I read up on MQOO_BIND_ON_OPEN, and it appears that it will let me
keep the messages together as long as they are messages on the same queue.
Correct?
Our design, though, has two correlated
messages, each on a different queue. The reason we have two mess
Bill,
That sounds reasonable, except if there's an app design constraint, e.g.
committing DB updates with MQPUTs. Hey Alan, wanna pony up for a server
license?
MQ-SERIES
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CA.COM>To
When resolving the location of the mq client channel tab file on a VMS host,
which environment variables are relevant? The Clients manual states:
MQCHLTAB - This specifies the name of the file containing the client channel
definition table.
On VM/ESA: GLOBALV SELECT CENV SETLP MQ
Rick,
I've been resistant about using the client over WAN at my shop.
With the Client, every API call causes traffic between the client and
the
server. (you can see this when watching the status of the client
svrconn channel).
For each MQI call you have to wait for a round trip communication.
Ex.
Dear MQA,
We are studying on sharing of a single queue manager by multiple CICS
regions. If we use CICS trigger monitor (i.e. CTKI), can the trigger
monitor distribute workload equally among the two CICS regions? If
otherwise, which component (MQ, CICS or else) can govern the workload
distribution
Marty,
Thank you. Granting the mqdev setid permission on the qmgr object did the
trick. Thanks to everyone else who responded too...Lee
R. Lee Eshleman
AES/PHEAA - IT Tech Services
(717) 720-2936
marty
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
NK.NET>
Rick,
Thank you for responding.
Indeed, compression might not be a solution. The problem arises because the
s/390 is being re-sited, changing the client connections from a happy high
capacity LAN to a slower and sadder WAN. The change has pushed up response
times beyond the pain threshold. A n
Anybody know when IBM will certify WAS ND, MQSeries and WBI for AIX 5.3 ?
Thanks
Francois van der Merwe
Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in
the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com
Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
Alan,
What sort of network problems are you experiencing? Compressing the data
may not be a solution.
"Lovett, Alan J"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
COM> To
Sent by: MQSeries [EMAIL PROTECTE
Hi,
We have a network problem between AIX clients talking to S/390 servers. We
are considering using the MO02 compression exit on the server/client
connection channels, to reduce network traffic. Does anyone else do this?
Any problems we should be aware of?
Many thanks for any replies.
Alan
I'll take a look at MQOO-BIND_ON_OPEN.
That sounds like it fits the bill.
The application is used to store BLOBs
on an EMC Centera device, which provides long term cheap storage for archival
purposes. We use two separate messages because one is binary data (pdfs,
Word docs, tif images), and the ot
There is an option on the MQOPEN call
that enables affinity. I think you would benefit from reading about
the MQOO_BIND_ON_OPEN
option in the App Dev manual.
Also look at the section "Reviewing
applications for message affinities"
in the Queue Mangers manual.
Tony Psaltis, Architect
Business So
Anybody have the procedure for MANUALLY removing a 5.0 Broker from a WINDOWS
box.
bobbee
_
Check out Election 2004 for up-to-date election news, plus voter tools and
more!
22 matches
Mail list logo
