name space. they all work fine without any channel and port involved.
many thanks for all the helping tips from everyone.
-Paul
From: Roger Lacroix [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Confusion: why MQJMS objects need a port?
Date: Thu, 18
Paul,
I just started with MQ-JMS, am trying to create administered objects,
a Q and a QCF using the JMSadmin tool. But I don't understand why
a port property is needed in these definitions.
You shouldn't need a PORT property defined. According to the Using Java
manual, you only need to specify
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Confusion: why MQJMS objects need a port?
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:22:40 -0400
Hi,
I just started with MQ-JMS, am trying to create administered objects, a Q
and a QCF using the JMSadmin tool. But I don't understand why a port
property is needed
Hi Paul,
Check your JNDI values with the JSMAdmin tool. You probably set your QCF with
the following command:
define qcf(qcfClient) qmgr(MY.QMGR) channel(SYSTEM.DEF.SVRCONN) hostname
(MYHOSTNAME) port(1414) transport(CLIENT)
Hence, you needing to increase the max channel attribute even though
