This didn't appear on the list so Iam forwarding it on ...
-----Original Message----- From: mqteam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 02:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Is SUN's JMS messaging superior to MQSeries? Hello All, I have found at least a few flaws in the design of the experiment: 1) The use of a single connection to a queue manager (something that never happens in real life) 2) The use of only a single message size, when comparing products one should play with message sizes. 3) I failed to see tuning performed on the queue manager, when installing and creating a queue manager on a machine as the one described, one should tune the WMQ properly Last but not least, when you read the support pack JMS performance with WMQ 5.3 on Windows 2K (mp7d) you can see WMQ out performing itself in a different benchmark design. Now I am not saying that Sun Java System Message queue is not a good product, or that the benchmark is neither interesting nor insightful, I just find it a little out of touch with the how messaging applications work. Cheers Didi ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Woloschuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, May 28, 2004 3:22 PM Subject: Is SUN's JMS messaging superior to MQSeries? > I came across a report which claims that Sun's Java > Message Queue software out-performs IBM's MQSeries. > The report can be found at: > > http://wwws.sun.com/software/products/message_queue/wp_JMSperformance.pdf > > Can anyone comment on the validity of this report and are there any > reports to the contrary - ie: showing that MQSeries performs better > than Sun's product? > > Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in > the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com > Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive Instructions for managing your mailing list subscription are provided in the Listserv General Users Guide available at http://www.lsoft.com Archive: http://vm.akh-wien.ac.at/MQSeries.archive
