"Potkay, Peter M (PLC, IT)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/12/2002
17:39:42
Please respond to MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: Paul Meekin)
Subject: Re: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What's the diff?
Heartbeat is valid for recievers. The below
Thanks Paul.
Very clear now.
Peter Potkay
IBM MQSeries Certified Specialist, Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
X 77906
-Original Message-
From: Paul Clarke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 3:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What&#
> What is the difference between these two, if any? Seems to me they both
> accomplish the same thing (allowing one side of a channel to see that the
> network is down and thus being able to go Inactive). The only thing I can
> guess is that Keep Alive applies only to TCP while Heartbeat will work
>Paul,
>Keep Alive is configured at the machine level, correct? So all TCP
>applications on a machine have to agree to a common value?
Most platforms allow you to only set a machine wide keep alive interval,
zOS is an exception, there may be others. Each socket application can
merely choose to sw
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What's the diff?
>What is the difference between these two, if any? Seems to me they both
>accomplish the same thing (allowing one side of a channel to see that the
>network is down and thus being able to go Inactive). The only thing I
>What is the difference between these two, if any? Seems to me they both
>accomplish the same thing (allowing one side of a channel to see that the
>network is down and thus being able to go Inactive). The only thing I can
>guess is that Keep Alive applies only to TCP while Heartbeat will work for
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2002 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What's the diff?
If I remember correctly, Heartbeat only works for Sender channels, keepalive
only works for receivers.
Fuzzy on the details though.
"Potkay, Peter
PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: Paul Meekin)
Subject: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What's the diff?
What is the difference between these two, if any? Seems to me they both
accomplish the same thing (allowing one side of a channel to see that the
network is down and thus being able to go Inactive). Th
M (PLC, IT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 02 December 2002 14:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Keep Alive vs Heartbeat - What's the diff?
>
>
> What is the difference between these two, if any? Seems to me
> they both accomplish the same thing (allowing one sid
What is the difference between these two, if any? Seems to me they both
accomplish the same thing (allowing one side of a channel to see that the
network is down and thus being able to go Inactive). The only thing I can
guess is that Keep Alive applies only to TCP while Heartbeat will work for
othe
10 matches
Mail list logo
