e a bridge
into CICS. Have you explored that ?
jbohumil@TCFBANK To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.COM cc:
Sent by: Subject: Re: MQ VS APPC
MQSERI
Title: RE: MQ VS APPC
>It's been a while, but DPL ? It sounds like a CICSism
>(Distributed Program Link ?).
Yep. Basicly you isolate your backend legacy file IO into CICS cobol programs which can be accessed via the equivalent of an EXEC CICS LINK with a COMMAREA. You
#x27;s sake isn't a good thing.
John Bohumil
cc:
Sent by: Subject: MQ VS APPC
MQSeries List
06/20/2002
02:48 PM
Pl
Series List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
06/20/2002 02:48 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: MQ VS APPC
We're looking at MQ series to handle an interface between an external vendor and our OS/390 CICS all VS
cc:
Sent by: Subject: MQ VS APPC
MQSERIES@akh-wie
n.ac.at
06/20/2002 02:48
PM
Please respond
to MQSERIES
We're looking at
Title: MQ VS APPC
We're looking at MQ series to handle an interface between an external vendor and our OS/390 CICS all VSAM legacy systems. We don't currently have a DPL "API" to do the back end stuff. Now it seems to me that since we have to write the back end an
