roblem. I
just need to figure out what.
Thanks for the help!
--Original Message-
From: David Awerbuch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: MQGET with wait in CICS
Janet,
Stefan raises a good point. Remember that the timeout interv
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: MQGET with wait in CICS
Janet,
are you sure that the GET with wait in your application program is not
implemented with a logic like this:
while MQRC = 2033 (no msg avail.)
MQGET nowait
end
This would explain the CPU hunger. I'd check the applicati
/wait.
> -Original Message-
> From: Dye, Janet E [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 2:24 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: MQGET with wait in CICS
>
> We have noticed that when a CICS program does a MQGET with wait, that
> during
> the time i
4/2002 05:24 PM
Please respond to MQSeries List
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: MQGET with wait in CICS
We have noticed that when a CICS program does a MQGET with wait, that during
the time interval that the task is waiting, that it is using
erval is used.
Just a thought (from nasty experiences...),
;-) Stefan
>From: "Dye, Janet E" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: MQSeries List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: MQGET with wait in CICS
>Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2002 16:24:00 -0500
>
>
We have noticed that when a CICS program does a MQGET with wait, that during
the time interval that the task is waiting, that it is using a lot of CPU
resources. When I do a MQGET with wait
in a batch environment, it does not appear to be using any resources during
the wait. Has anyone
else expe
