Re: SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03

2002-10-09 Thread Welch, Karen S (PLC, IT)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03 Well, going to NT won't solve you're problems, I'm afraid. We upgraded to CSD03 to take care of a problem very similar to yours, and, while it solved that problem, the parsing

SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03

2002-10-08 Thread Martin Rydman
Hi! Not like the one you're mentioning in your prevoius post, but a bunch of others. Messagesets won't deploy, the TDS-parser seems to parse deployed messagesets differently, probably due to tightened validity-checks. Just now I got a confirmation from IBM that a message that was correctly

Re: SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03

2002-10-08 Thread Robert Broderick
PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 09:35:13 +0200 Hi! Not like the one you're mentioning in your prevoius post, but a bunch of others. Messagesets won't deploy, the TDS-parser seems to parse deployed

Re: SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03

2002-10-08 Thread Robert Broderick
Sounds like the frame work is starting to resemble a Golem!! Sticks, twigs and gum!! Fix one thing break another. From: Martin Rydman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: MQSeries List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: SV: Re: SV: MQSI CSD03 Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 14:48:46 +0200 Well