The manual recommends that the name of the XMIT queue will
be the same as the name of the remote queue manager.
Is that a MUST? (That is can I use the XMIT-Q name as a 'pointer')?
Or did any of you see any site that uses other names for the XMIT queues?
(e.g. can you configure channels between tw
Definitions for reply messages.
-Original Message-
From: Bullock, Rebecca (CSC) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: XMITQ name
Yuval -- Yes, you can. We run several sets of channels between two qmgrs and
each channel has it&#
Ofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 August 2003 14:32
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: XMITQ name
The manual recommends that the name of the XMIT queue will
be the same as the name of the remote queue manager.
Is that a MUST? (That is can I use the XMIT-Q name as a 'pointer')? Or did
Your third word answered your question. It 'recommends'. Call it
whatever you want.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/11/03 9:32:26 AM >>>
The manual recommends that the name of the XMIT queue will
be the same as the name of the remote queue manager.
Is that a MUST? (That is can I use the XMIT-Q name as
name isn't the local qmgr. It saves going through the
qremote name resolution process AND it means that your application will
respond to whichever qmgr my have sent the query.
-Original Message-
From: Yuval Ofer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:32 AM
To: [E
