Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

Hi, See https://musescore.org/en/node/20099 I would still love to have a plugin or even a core tool to add fingerings to a piano score in MuseScore! lasconic 2017-08-25 20:26 GMT+02:00 Tommaso Cucinotta : > On 23/08/2017 22:24, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: > >> b) show

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 23/08/2017 22:24, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: b) show in full light the next key-sequence I'm waiting for with option 1.b) above, however also show in half-light (darker) the subsequent key-sequence I gave a shot at this "look-ahead" feature, a snapshot of it working is at:

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

[+list] On 23/08/2017 22:33, Ariel Aramburu wrote: "*System Exclusive*. This message type allows manufacturers to create their own messages (such as bulk dumps, patch parameters, and other non-spec data) and provides a mechanism for creating additional MIDI Specification messages. The

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

You could use http://electronicmusic.wikia.com/wiki/System_exclusive or you could send events using another protocol than MIDI. MuseScore embeds an OSC server, it doesn't send OSC message during playback but it could. OSC might be a lot more flexible than MIDI for your purpose (but I guess it

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 23/08/2017 00:29, Ariel Aramburu wrote: Nice video !!! Thanks, I'm working on a better one, showing some more features :-), and with someone helping with the camera :-)... Have you seen this keyboard with integrated lights ? (

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

meddelande- > Från: Tommaso Cucinotta [mailto:tommaso.cucino...@gmail.com] > Skickat: den 23 augusti 2017 00:14 > Till: mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net > Ämne: Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux > (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04) > > On 21/08/2017 13:48, To

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

// -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: Tommaso Cucinotta [mailto:tommaso.cucino...@gmail.com] Skickat: den 23 augusti 2017 00:14 Till: mscore-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Ämne: Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04) On 21/08/2017 13:48, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 21/08/2017 13:48, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: your facebook link doesn't work btw. security settings for that post changed to allow outsiders, now you should see it. Video now (with poor recording abilities being quite evident :-)):

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 20/08/2017 16:24, Tommaso Cucinotta wrote: 3) the MuseScore version I succesfully managed to finally compile, tweak/modify and use, is origin/2.2 (standard Qt 5.7 from Ubuntu 17.04) double-checking commits, I found out the confusion: this was actually based on 2.0.3, now I forward-ported

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04

a < > m...@outsideshore.com>; Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucino...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* AW: Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux > (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04 > > > > Building 2.1 or 2.2 on/for Linux is IMHO legitimate as many distributions > d

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

That cherry-pick would only be needed in 2.0.2 or older, as 2.0.3 and later have it already. Tommaso Cucinotta schrieb >On 20/08/2017 22:14, Lasconic wrote: >> Where is patch 5320fa196 ? > >perhaps I had mistakenly copied the hash after cherry-pick, instead of before >;-P ? anyway,

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04

Building 2.1 or 2.2 on/for Linux is IMHO legitimate as many distributions don't provide the former and MuseScore doesn't provide nightlies for the latter. Tommaso Cucinotta schrieb >On 20/08/2017 21:21, Marc Sabatella wrote: >> Still, the more important question is the one I asked -

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04

gmail.com> Subject: AW: Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04 Building 2.1 or 2.2 on/for Linux is IMHO legitimate as many distributions don't provide the former and MuseScore doesn't provide nightlies fo

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04

On 20/08/2017 21:21, Marc Sabatella wrote: Still, the more important question is the one I asked - is there a reason you are building 2.2 at all? the answer is similar to the one previously given in my prior post about the "why 2.0.x"... ... convenience, ease and speed of getting started,

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 20/08/2017 22:14, Lasconic wrote: Where is patch 5320fa196 ? perhaps I had mistakenly copied the hash after cherry-pick, instead of before ;-P ? anyway, the patch was that simple 1-liner with a reset() call. your facebook link doesn't work btw. security settings for that post changed

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

Where is patch 5320fa196 ? The patch from https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/commit/ae7495b7633d50 a15e2bc3767add73ffb40817f9 is already in the 2.2 branch https://github.com/musescore/MuseScore/blob/2.2/zerberus/zerberusgui.cpp#L99 your facebook link doesn't work btw. lasconic 2017-08-20

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu?==?utf-8?q? 17.04

Could be, or it might just be that while 5.4 is recommended and what released builds use, 5.3 might technically be sufficient. Still, the more important question is the one I asked - is there a reason you are building 2.2 at all? Normally, people should *not* be doing that, especially for

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 20/08/2017 16:43, Marc Sabatella wrote: If you do a search of the issue tracker you should find previous discussion of this. indeed, https://musescore.org/en/node/71001 and patch 5320fa196 applied nicely and removed the spurious dialog, thanks!

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

I might have missed this discussion, but there a reason you are building 2.2? New development should normally be on master. Anyjow, my understanding is the spurious Loading dialog on Linux of using the wrong Qt version. I believe 2.2 is supposed to use 5.4, some newer versions aren't totally

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 18/08/2017 19:15, Lasconic wrote: Werner and I build several time daily from the command line. Werner on Linux and I, on MacOSX. Also for every commit on the 2.2 and master branch, Travis runs on the command line on Ubuntu 14.04 https://travis-ci.org/musescore/MuseScore/jobs/265942105 So

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

Werner and I build several time daily from the command line. Werner on Linux and I, on MacOSX. Also for every commit on the 2.2 and master branch, Travis runs on the command line on Ubuntu 14.04 https://travis-ci.org/musescore/MuseScore/jobs/265942105 So there is something very particular in

Re: [Mscore-developer] ?= Compiling MuseScore on Linux (Ubuntu=?utf-8?q? 17.04)

On 18/08/2017 17:41, Ralf Mattes wrote: Where did you get your sources from and how exactly did you try to build. Hi, so I guess from answers to your post that the problem we're facing is that core devels build from some IDE, so the command-line is not used that often. Hmm - that allmost