Jim Newton wrote
> It seems to me that the only thing ornaments and articulations have in
> common is the manner which they get rendered in print. Although, it get
> the impression when dealing with the code, that they should both be
> represented as two subclasses of some common class.
This is
It seems to me that the only thing ornaments and articulations have in common
is the manner which they get rendered in print. Although, it get the
impression when dealing with the code, that they should both be represented
as two subclasses of some common class.
--
View this message in