On 07.09.2012 23:32, wahono sri wrote:
I'm sure I do wrong in SDL event implementation for mseevent. mouse
click event sent to mseevent but it does not fire procedure in widget
event.
Martin, will you check it?
Seems not to work on Windows 2000:
testsdl.exe - Einsprungpunkt nicht gefunden
Der
On 07.09.2012 20:00, Ivanko B wrote:
You copy into the project directory:
libeay32.dll, libss32.dll, ssleay32.dll. Which one to use?
Removing libss32.dll from the directory doesn't fix.
So mainline distributions contain ssleay32.dll and libeay32.dll? 100%?
Why do you think ssleay32.dll is more official than libssl32.dll?
=
Maybe.. PostgreSQL, STunell .. only rely on ssleay32.dll.
PS:
Me've copied libssl32.dll 1.0.0c from Win32OpenSSL_Light-1_0_1c.exe
to the app directory (where STunnel DLLs are present) still having all
these DLLs in
So you probably must use masterdataset.onafterscroll to trigger refreshing the
filter condition in the detail dataset.
===
More details please. Me should use indexing on key fields in the
detail dataset, correct ?.. Which command(s) performs the mentioned
refreshing... How to setup lookup
runs on all platforms
Win-9x Win-2000 don't belong to these anymore :)
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed
1) if inhering form uses an active dso_local dataset defined in its
inherited form - it result in error (operation can't be performed on
active dataset) on reloading the project (the child form doesn't load
to IDE on F12) until the dataset is set inactive in the parent. The
dataset of parent form
I think it's enough we start from WinXP. Remember, new software
product is for present and future hardware/OS, not for old
hardware/OS.
I try win98 on new PC and got some trouble in drivers and if it runs,
it run slowly. Microsoft didn't support again for their product below
winxp, why we should
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows/help/end-support
http://support.microsoft.com/ph/1131
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has
Why do you think ssleay32.dll is more official than libssl32.dll?
Googling for :
libeay32 ssleay32 = 136 000 hits
libeay32libssl32 = 25 900 hits
That's 5 times as prevailing :)
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Official and unofficial OS supported by SDL 2
http://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/file/default/README.Platforms
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape
Also, reverting to inherited for group boxes anchored to bottom on
parent doesn't restore their anchoring to bottom but seems to restores
the position from top instead. It does matter if the child form gets
resized to bottom.
Martin, there're some inherited form issues - me wrote some reports to
this conference but they haven't loaded yet for some reasons.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways
On Saturday 08 September 2012 10:30:26 Ivanko B wrote:
Why do you think ssleay32.dll is more official than libssl32.dll?
=
Maybe.. PostgreSQL, STunell .. only rely on ssleay32.dll.
PS:
Me've copied libssl32.dll 1.0.0c from Win32OpenSSL_Light-1_0_1c.exe
to the app directory (where
How about the Google statistics acc to which ssleay32 wins 5:1 over libssl32 ?
That's with the current loading order we have 5 times as bigger
chances to encounter troubles with 3-rd party helpers (like STunnel,
PostgreSQL,) ?
PS:
Me understand that the problem has arisen because of placing the
On Saturday 08 September 2012 11:42:40 Ivanko B wrote:
1) if inhering form uses an active dso_local dataset defined in its
inherited form - it result in error (operation can't be performed on
active dataset) on reloading the project (the child form doesn't load
to IDE on F12) until the dataset
If you index one key field and lookup that field you get a single record only,
no? But earlier you wrote you need a list of detail records?
==
Well, indexes - to speed the things :) No need for multiple detail
records ? Only calling detail_dataset.refresh with filter expression
set in
On Saturday 08 September 2012 16:59:32 Ivanko B wrote:
If you index one key field and lookup that field you get a single record
only, no? But earlier you wrote you need a list of detail records?
==
Well, indexes - to speed the things :) No need for multiple detail
records ? Only
2) on the child form me have dsMasterparent form parent
form.dsMaster as choice in datasource's comboboxes - which one to use
?
It depends on your needs. :-)
Most likely dsMasterparent form.
If they're analogs then having them both is misleading :)
matching records and a second to hold the filtered
===
What is the difference between matching filtered ones here ?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's
Try to find out where GetRawInputData() is used and how it can be replaced
with older Windows functions. Sometimes it is also possible to use an upgrade
dll to support new Windows functions. I usually try to link problematic
functions with getprocedureadress().
Why you don't upgrade to
Why you don't upgrade to WIndows 8 preview,
===
It's easy for us - illoyal pirates :) Not for europeans :)
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
In tprocmonitor functions :
- Is listentoprocess similiar with SDL_AddEventWatch?
- Is unlistentoprocess similiar with SDL_DelEventWatch?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways
Hallo Ivanko,
Du schriebst am Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:29:20 +0500:
libeay32 ssleay32 = 136 000 hits
libeay32libssl32 = 25 900 hits
That's 5 times as prevailing :)
And if you add the missing space in the search for the second set?
v
(I.e. search for libeay32 libssl32)
On 08/09/12 10:54, wahono sri wrote:
it run slowly. Microsoft didn't support again for their product below
winxp, why we should support it?
We have lots of clients still using Win200. I even use Win2000 for all
my windows development work - though I always run it in a VM now, and
not on real
On 08/09/12 11:33, wahono sri wrote:
Official and unofficial OS supported by SDL 2
http://hg.libsdl.org/SDL/file/default/README.Platforms
Oh no, OS/2 is not in that list - it was for SDL 1.2 ;-) Also FreeBSD
and Solaris being in the unofficial support list is a bit worrying.
Regards,
-
25 matches
Mail list logo
