>> > That seems to be another problem. Steps?
>>
>> Hmm... doesn't expose with the current test case. Please a clue what to
>> add to the test case related to displayvalues.
>>
> No clue. :-)
>
http://www.likan.uz/uploads/mse_testcases/PODPISKA_TCASE.ZIP is a
testcase to the working project.
DB-s
Which else props to use for detecting changes between POST ?
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/cl
On Friday 14 September 2012 18:42:01 news.gmane.org wrote:
> What are the conditions of change of return of "asold*" ? Applying
> updates ?
Yes.
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks li
What are the conditions of change of return of "asold*" ? Applying
updates ?
POST doesn't affect the "asold*" return values (checked in
"field[n].OnChange" ).
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their produ
- sqlqry1 provides (via lookupbuffer) localquery.field1
- sqlqry2 provides (via lookupbuffer) localquery.field2, and sqlqry2
depends on a param bound to localquery.field1
Will this work as to proper values in localquery.field1 &
localquery.field2 ?
-
>> Hmm... doesn't expose with the current test case. Please a clue what to
>> add to the test case related to displayvalues.
>>
> No clue. :-)
>
It may even be a damage to MFM files caused by the recent problems.
In which scenarios can these props be used ?
-
On Friday 14 September 2012 16:52:07 news.gmane.org wrote:
> >> Here attached. Happens on deleting persistent fields (of qryMaster) by
> >> the
> >> fields editor.
> >
> > That seems to be another problem. Steps?
>
> Hmm... doesn't expose with the current test case. Please a clue what to
> add to t
>> Here attached. Happens on deleting persistent fields (of qryMaster) by
>> the
>> fields editor.
>
> That seems to be another problem. Steps?
>
Hmm... doesn't expose with the current test case. Please a clue what to
add to the test case related to displayvalues.
---
On Friday 14 September 2012 13:15:19 news.gmane.org wrote:
> > A screenshot of the not informative error message please so I can see
> > what you
> > mean.
>
> Here attached. Happens on deleting persistent fields (of qryMaster) by the
> fields editor.
That seems to be another problem. Steps?
> Better use field components
Sure but after stabilizing :) Although it's usually my choice.
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics
On Friday 14 September 2012 16:34:09 news.gmane.org wrote:
> Here is a piece of my today's code :
>
> with qryMaster do begin
>actFindIndex.enabled:=
> not (fields[0]{company_code}.isnull or fields[1]{catalog_code}.isnull
> or fields[2]{client_type_code}.isnull);
> end;
>
Better use field
Here is a piece of my today's code :
with qryMaster do begin
actFindIndex.enabled:=
not (fields[0]{company_code}.isnull or fields[1]{catalog_code}.isnull
or fields[2]{client_type_code}.isnull);
end;
--
Got visi
> It fetches the values before post by a fieldlink updatedata call AFAIK .
>
What should me do to see the values ?
>> PS:
>> Me have had to recreate almost from zero some forms with inheritance
>> because of the wrong fields order bug. It was a really painful bug.
>>
> You use the field number re
On Friday 14 September 2012 15:19:35 news.gmane.org wrote:
> Me tried to use it for writting initial values from a just SELECTed query
> to another (local dataset with appended single record) query but the
> target query seems don't receive the values (it should display them in
> bound DB boolean
Me tried to use it for writting initial values from a just SELECTed query
to another (local dataset with appended single record) query but the
target query seems don't receive the values (it should display them in
bound DB boolean edits). Where to dig?
PS:
Me have had to recreate almost fro
On Friday 14 September 2012 12:13:27 news.gmane.org wrote:
> > Why do you think "If there's an exception then rollback the last change"
> > can
> > be done without a big development effort?
>
> If to intercept the mistake as early as possible so that it won't
> propagate & branch..
> Though an exce
leaves in PAS-file, sure.
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;262219671;13503038;y?
http://inf
that's components dropped on the from later.
It means manual deleting their references in PAS-file before new inherting
operation.
As designed ?
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks l
A screenshot of the not informative error message please so I can see
what you
mean.
Here attached. Happens on deleting persistent fields (of qryMaster) by the
fields editor.<>--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no ide
On Friday 14 September 2012 11:31:52 news.gmane.org wrote:
> With the latest test case:
>
> - create a new form inherited form MAINFO
> - note that the tabwiget is unusable (doesn't accept tab pages) & the
> button lost its caption
> - to fix we should call "revert to inherited" for all affected co
On Friday 14 September 2012 12:02:50 news.gmane.org wrote:
> >> If a dbenumeditlb on another form references a lookupbuffer on another
> >> data module,..
> >
> > Screenshot?
>
> The current project haven't yet grown to this stage :)
>
A screenshot of the not informative error message please so I c
> Why do you think "If there's an exception then rollback the last change"
> can
> be done without a big development effort?
>
If to intercept the mistake as early as possible so that it won't
propagate & branch..
Though an exception (me offer to rely on) usually happens on a quite deed
stag
>> If a dbenumeditlb on another form references a lookupbuffer on another
>> data module,..
>>
> Screenshot?
>
The current project haven't yet grown to this stage :)
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their pr
On Friday 14 September 2012 11:51:22 news.gmane.org wrote:
> >> Why ? If there's an exception then rollback the last change.
> >
> > OK, so please try it and send a patch.
>
> It seems that You're tired. Really, the latest bugs ate like a can of
> worms shaken out :)
>
Why do you think "If there's
> Not a 100% reliable receipt.
> With the tets case, Trying to edit "frame.caption" of the page of the
> inherited tabwidget makes this tabpage wrongly sized.
>
Hmm, it seems to be a common (w/o inheritance etc) problem of TTabWidget
with single page.
--
>> Why ? If there's an exception then rollback the last change.
>>
> OK, so please try it and send a patch.
>
>
It seems that You're tired. Really, the latest bugs ate like a can of
worms shaken out :)
--
Got visibilit
On Friday 14 September 2012 11:47:27 news.gmane.org wrote:
> >> fix. Important for complex projects with multiple inter-form references.
> >
> > Example?
>
> If a dbenumeditlb on another form references a lookupbuffer on another
> data module,..
>
Screenshot?
--
>> fix. Important for complex projects with multiple inter-form references.
>>
> Example?
>
If a dbenumeditlb on another form references a lookupbuffer on another
data module,..
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea
> - to fix we should call "revert to inherited" for all affected componets
>
Not a 100% reliable receipt.
With the tets case, Trying to edit "frame.caption" of the page of the
inherited tabwidget makes this tabpage wrongly sized.
On Friday 14 September 2012 11:03:53 news.gmane.org wrote:
> > AFAIK the messages are informative.
>
> They don't point to where (lookup buffer component name etc,..) to go for
> fix. Important for complex projects with multiple inter-form references.
>
Example?
> >> To rollback EVERYTHING (incl t
With the latest test case:
- create a new form inherited form MAINFO
- note that the tabwiget is unusable (doesn't accept tab pages) & the
button lost its caption
- to fix we should call "revert to inherited" for all affected componets
PS:
We introduced some more bugs but anyway we'll behefit f
> AFAIK the messages are informative.
>
They don't point to where (lookup buffer component name etc,..) to go for
fix. Important for complex projects with multiple inter-form references.
>> To rollback EVERYTHING (incl the initiating change) on such exceptions.
>>
> Needs another man-year of de
On Friday 14 September 2012 10:16:37 news.gmane.org wrote:
> >> Here we have an anonymous exception message giving no guess where & what
> >> to fix.
> >
> > Example?
>
> In the latest test case, try to change (in fielddefs) field name of
> tmsesqlquery2.FieldDefs[0] then reset Active property of t
>> Here we have an anonymous exception message giving no guess where & what
>> to fix.
>
> Example?
>
In the latest test case, try to change (in fielddefs) field name of
tmsesqlquery2.FieldDefs[0] then reset Active property of the query. We
will have 2 exception sources here : 1) persistent li
On Friday 14 September 2012 09:58:40 news.gmane.org wrote:
> For instance, with a local mode query :
>- we have a lookup buffer with defined bindings (or a set persistent
> fields)
>- we change a field name (in FieldDefs) of the query which is bound to
> the lookup buffer (or the fields set
For instance, with a local mode query :
- we have a lookup buffer with defined bindings (or a set persistent
fields)
- we change a field name (in FieldDefs) of the query which is bound to
the lookup buffer (or the fields set)
Here we have an anonymous exception message giving no guess wh
for local queries wit manually defined FieldDefs.
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Find out how fast your code is with AppDynamics Lite.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;26221967
37 matches
Mail list logo
