Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Variant part in MSElang objects

2017-06-06 Thread Michael Schnell
On 04.06.2017 06:21, Martin Schreiber wrote: Yes, and the replacement of "case" in pascal records. Why introduce a completely new notation instead of just stay with "case" ? This would be rather obvious in Pascal. -Michael ---

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Variant part in MSElang objects

2017-06-06 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 11:36:34 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 04.06.2017 06:21, Martin Schreiber wrote: > > Yes, and the replacement of "case" in pascal records. > > Why introduce a completely new notation instead of just stay with > "case" ? This would be rather obvious in Pascal. > Because case i

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Variant part in MSElang objects

2017-06-06 Thread Michael Schnell
On 06.06.2017 13:12, Martin Schreiber wrote: Because case in records is crap. It misleadingly pretends that there is access type control by the tags and it is clumsy. Right you are. But it never had been different in Pascal :( -Michael

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Variant part in MSElang objects

2017-06-06 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13:32:28 Michael Schnell wrote: > On 06.06.2017 13:12, Martin Schreiber wrote: > > Because case in records is crap. It misleadingly pretends that there is > > access type control by the tags and it is clumsy. > > Right you are. But it never had been different in Pascal :( >

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] Variant part in MSElang objects

2017-06-06 Thread Sieghard
Hallo Martin, Du schriebst am Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:12:33 +0200: > Because case in records is crap. It misleadingly pretends that there is > access type control by the tags and it is clumsy. No, that's not the case generally. It is so for the Borland dialects, but not for others. There _are_ Pascal