On 04.06.2017 06:21, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Yes, and the replacement of "case" in pascal records.
Why introduce a completely new notation instead of just stay with
"case" ? This would be rather obvious in Pascal.
-Michael
---
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 11:36:34 Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 04.06.2017 06:21, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > Yes, and the replacement of "case" in pascal records.
>
> Why introduce a completely new notation instead of just stay with
> "case" ? This would be rather obvious in Pascal.
>
Because case i
On 06.06.2017 13:12, Martin Schreiber wrote:
Because case in records is crap. It misleadingly pretends that there is access
type control by the tags and it is clumsy.
Right you are. But it never had been different in Pascal :(
-Michael
On Tuesday 06 June 2017 13:32:28 Michael Schnell wrote:
> On 06.06.2017 13:12, Martin Schreiber wrote:
> > Because case in records is crap. It misleadingly pretends that there is
> > access type control by the tags and it is clumsy.
>
> Right you are. But it never had been different in Pascal :(
>
Hallo Martin,
Du schriebst am Tue, 6 Jun 2017 13:12:33 +0200:
> Because case in records is crap. It misleadingly pretends that there is
> access type control by the tags and it is clumsy.
No, that's not the case generally. It is so for the Borland dialects, but
not for others. There _are_ Pascal
5 matches
Mail list logo