Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSE pcaudio.

2018-03-30 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Friday 30 March 2018 14:48:18 fredvs wrote: > > You don't want to publish your changes? Why? > > Yes, no problems to publish the changes of Pcaudiolib. > > > It is enough if you host your pcaudiolib version on your GitHub account. > > Ha, no need to show all the source of the application that

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSE pcaudio.

2018-03-30 Thread fredvs
> You don't want to publish your changes? Why? Yes, no problems to publish the changes of Pcaudiolib. > It is enough if you host your pcaudiolib version on your GitHub account. Ha, no need to show all the source of the application that use the "updated" Pcaudiolib ? > What other problems? A

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSE pcaudio.

2018-03-30 Thread fredvs
> Which license problems? Please explain. If you use eSpeakNG as executable (to not have licence problems) but change code of Pcaudiolib, it will have license problems. > . I would expect that synthesizer parameters have much more impact than > the sample format. I do not talk about sample

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSE pcaudio.

2018-03-30 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Thursday 29 March 2018 22:13:48 fredvs wrote: > Are you really sure that original eSpeak is dead ? > Yes, see here: https://sourceforge.net/p/espeak/code/391/log/?path= > And the creator is still active in his forum. Last post 2015? > Sorry, but I will stay with original eSpeak (and his

Re: [MSEide-MSEgui-talk] MSE pcaudio.

2018-03-30 Thread Martin Schreiber
On Thursday 29 March 2018 20:43:04 fredvs wrote: > Pf, so much easier to close things... > You write: " If you compile espeak-ng as executable, espeak-ng will need pcaudiolib as dependency. If I do adapt pcaudiolib (for example for better latency or using float 32 resolution), I will have