Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-12 Thread Thomas Taranowski
This is great news! Is c++ an officially supported aspect of the port? Thomas Taranowski | 425-442-9209 | skype: thomas.taranowski | baringforge.com On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:48 AM, DJ Delorie wrote: > > Just FYI, the port is now "official" as it's been approved and checked > in to the FSF

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-12 Thread DJ Delorie
> Okay I'll ask... Is there FORTRAN support? No! :-) (but it might work anyway, I haven't tested) > Now on to my real question... > > how much real world testing has been done? Has the output been put > onto real msp430 chips? I'm testing against our simulator (it's in the gdb repo). I'v

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-12 Thread DJ Delorie
Just FYI, the port is now "official" as it's been approved and checked in to the FSF repository! http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-09/msg00107.html I have some follow-up patches that will get commited "shortly" too, though. --

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-12 Thread DJ Delorie
> Is c++ an officially supported aspect of the port? I'm going to conditionally say "yes" because, while I build and test C++, I know there are some language features of C I took advantage of to get far (20-bit) addressing, that C++ simply doesn't support. So I'm not sure how well C++ will work

Re: [Mspgcc-users] Unofficial Red Hat Port

2013-09-12 Thread Eric Decker
Okay I'll ask... Is there FORTRAN support? Now on to my real question... how much real world testing has been done? Has the output been put onto real msp430 chips? Or are you testing against the test suites? just wondering how much it has been banged on. Is it Alpha/Beta status? I hand