Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

2017-03-19 Thread Adam Juelich
Well, yes. But that doesn't address the currently 1500 clients I have out there that have been neglected for months/years. On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Eric Morrison wrote: > I'd wrap it in a TS. > > Get Outlook for iOS > > -- > *From:* l

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

2017-03-19 Thread Eric Morrison
I'd wrap it in a TS. Get Outlook for iOS From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com on behalf of Adam Juelich Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 11:03:09 AM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching Thinking about th

Re: [mssms] Catching up on patching

2017-03-19 Thread Adam Juelich
Thinking about this more, it may be better to utilize the Application Method. That way I can chain the Dependencies in the proper order. Otherwise, I'd have to craft the SUG's accordingly, deploy them and wait for compliance, and then deploy the next one. 1. .NET 4.6.2 2. WMF 5.1 3. WUA