[mssms] SCCM 2007: April 2017 Security Updates Expired

2017-05-16 Thread RJ Subscriber
Last month's Windows 7 rollup updates and the security only updates, which included the SMB worm patch are now expired in SCCM 2007. That means we have to seriously accelerate the May cycle because we can't continue to patch from April or earlier. I think this is an unintended consequence of t

RE: [mssms] Static DPs

2017-05-16 Thread Richard Poole
That’s where it gets more fuzzy. These are workgroup PCs, so using AD to specify the secondary site is a no-go. Thank you, Richard Poole From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Eric Groff Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 10:55 AM To: mssms@lists.myit

[mssms] RE: 1702 Express Install Files

2017-05-16 Thread Phil Wilcock
Yep, seems to be an acknowledged issue. Seems the range requests are not quite right in some way which is resulting in slow downloads.. Couple of similar stories on Technet forums too so you are not alone 😊 From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf

Re: [mssms] Static DPs

2017-05-16 Thread Eric Groff
If that are in separate domains then AD should tell them where to go. On May 16, 2017 10:52 AM, Richard Poole wrote: Hey everyone, I’ve got a situation where a couple of companies have merged together and have overlapping IP subnets and workgroup systems so a secondary site isn’t really wor

[mssms] Static DPs

2017-05-16 Thread Richard Poole
Hey everyone, I've got a situation where a couple of companies have merged together and have overlapping IP subnets and workgroup systems so a secondary site isn't really working. They don't plan to change their networks for a while but still want a single hierarchy instead of setting up multip

[mssms] 1702 Express Install Files

2017-05-16 Thread Enley, Carl
Is anyone using this feature in SCCM 1702? I was really looking forward to getting this up and running after the 1702 upgrade but I am a little disappointed with the results I am seeing. I understand the initial download is larger and I am okay with that, my patch package jumped from 13.1GB to