RE: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN

2013-07-16 Thread JONES, RICK J
Sent: Tuesday, July 16, 2013 2:27 PM To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN ok, well I got some kiosk on 14.4 k (over 6k using 3g are less) so I’m trying to come up with a bandwidth recommendation LTE could be a option, but not all kiosk are in a LTE locations. Being on

RE: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN

2013-07-16 Thread Johan Arwidmark
Don’t really have any guidelines available, sorry From: listsad...@lists.myitforum.com [mailto:listsad...@lists.myitforum.com] On Behalf Of Danny Guillory Sent: den 16 juli 2013 23:27 To: mssms@lists.myitforum.com Subject: Re: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN ok, well I got some kiosk on 14.4 k

Re: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN

2013-07-16 Thread Danny Guillory
ok, well I got some kiosk on 14.4 k (over 6k using 3g are less) so I’m trying to come up with a bandwidth recommendation LTE could be a option, but not all kiosk are in a LTE locations. Being on that slow of connection some are most features of CM are irrelevant (like OS refresh's, etc.) and you

RE: [mssms] RE: Low Bandwidth WAN

2013-07-16 Thread Christopher.Catlett
I would say LTE is more of a "high-latency" connection, than a "low-bandwidth" connection. Christopher Catlett Consultant | Detroit Office 248-876-9738 |Fax 877.406.9647 Sogeti USA 26957 Northwestern Highway, Suite 130, Southfield, MI 48033-8456 www.us.sogeti.com