Re: Wanted! Programs that don't run in any MSX emulator

2002-03-14 Thread b . wijnen
Hi, As far as I know, the best way to make programs to detect an emulator, is checking the VDP timing. So do a copy, and see how much time it takes to finish. Something like that. Bye, shevek On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote: > Hi all! > > I wondered if there a

Re: Z8530

2002-03-13 Thread b . wijnen
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:19:45PM -0300, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: > > Well, of course you should do that as well. But if it gets ignored and > > you receive data anyway, then this data should not overwrite anything > > important. In the linux kernel this aproach would generate an

Re: Z8530

2002-03-13 Thread b . wijnen
> > I hope UZIX doesn't crash from the buffer overrun? > > It probably will. But buffer is in high memory area, just before MSX system > variables. A big buffer overrun will trash system vars and hangs MSX. > > > It should just drop the data I'd say. If you have TCP connections, that > > should

Re: Z8530

2002-03-12 Thread b . wijnen
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:01:23AM -0300, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: > > Hi, > > Anyone here knows the Z8530 Serial Controller Chip? I'm > working on a driver for it for UZIX, but I'm having a problem: clearing > the DTR bit (register 5) doesn't make the host stop send

Re: 2 mapper speed question

2001-05-31 Thread B. Wijnen
On 31 May 2001, Bastiaan MSX wrote: > Hello, > > The situation: NMS8250: internal mapper 128kB, external 1MB > > How do I prevent the use of the internal mapper so I don't lose time switching > slots? > Can I block or disable the internal mapper (with a programm)? > > hope you can help In har

Re: Background

2001-04-19 Thread B. Wijnen
The link works fine for me and I've got a new background :) On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Jose Carlos Clemente wrote: > David Heremans wrote: > > > For all the people who want a nice MSX oriented background for a 1024x800 > > resolution, have a look at the picture I made. > > > > http://msx.gnu-linux.n

Re: Triplex

2001-04-12 Thread B. Wijnen
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Pierre Gielen wrote: > > You can play Triplex with 16 MSX computers, 16 midi cables and 16 Music > > modules > > How about asking a few people who have a Music module (like me) to come to > the Tilburg fair with it and give a demonstration? BTW, what kind of a game > is Trip

RE: v9938 databook...

2001-03-28 Thread B. Wijnen
I have a pretty good photocopy (at least most of it is pretty good...) I'll take it with me to Tilburg. Where can I find you? On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Hans Otten wrote: > Yes, with the right software (Finereader for example) ocr scanning is a very > mature solution of getting text into editable form

Re: v9938 databook...

2001-03-26 Thread B. Wijnen
Laurens Holst wrote: > I am manually entering the contents of the v9938 databook into a textfile. > just to let you know, in case someone else is also doing this. > current progress: page 11 of 161 (bareuh...). This sounds like a very good initiative. But it will take a lot of (your) time. Isn't

Re: How To Get The Murderer of Grison?

2001-02-13 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > > I found that I need to hit the slot machine with 3 > > snatchers' head, then I can get pass the VIP room. > > However, I can't do it! It is so hard to hit 3 > > snatchers' head in the slot machine. > > The three snatcher heads are no coincidence

Re: [OT] Merry X-Mas & happy newyear and stuff

2000-12-19 Thread B. Wijnen
Ok, in this case we would want it to let it through, but I bet this filter catches a lot of spam as well... Bye, shevek On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, by way of Maarten ter Huurne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > And sometimes the mailinglist filters too strong... The following message > from Eric

Re: Enanito si, pero con que pedazo!

2000-12-19 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Sean Young wrote: > On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:50:07PM +, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > > The MSX mailinglist server only checks for large messages, so small > > attachments can slip through. The list is migrating to a different list > > server program soon, hopefully wit

Re: PSG R#14 bit 6?

2000-11-27 Thread B. Wijnen
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Alex Wulms wrote: > ] Everything I know is that this bit was used by MegaSCSI in some > ] some apps to "blink" the Kana Led (according to the program manuals). > So the answer is that the bit is used for the KANA led, to make it burn or > not burn. Please remember you're

Re: PSG R#14 bit 6?

2000-11-21 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > > > "0" for syllable layout; "1" for JIS layout > > Syllable is not just letters, but special groups ("lettergrepen" in Dutch). > For example, "syllable" itself contains syllables "syl", "la" and "ble". > > JIS is "Japanese International Stand

Re: PSG R#14 bit 6?

2000-11-20 Thread B. Wijnen
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Daniel Jorge Caetano wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:29:34 +0100, Sean Young wrote: > > > > >According to Portar.txt bit 6 of PSG register 14 is "On japanese machines only". > >It's not the KANA led, that's bit 7 of PSG register 15. Does anyone know what > >that bit does? Th

GFX9000 and IDE interface

2000-10-02 Thread B. Wijnen
Hi, Some time ago, I had a big mess on my desk which accidentally removed half of my IDE cartridge from my msx (a philips nms8220). In the other slot I had my gfx9000. I didn't notice, so I switched it on and didn't get anything useful on the screen. So I checked it out and found the problem. The

Re: File crypter

2000-09-28 Thread B. Wijnen
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, pepito sbazzeguti wrote: > Hello! > > I've found on the net explaination about DES (Data Encryption Standard) and > I've implemented it in MSX-C. > Do you think a file de/crypter could be useful? Sure. An encrypted filesystem would be even better, though ;) Bye, main(){

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-27 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote: > UZIX processes have priority. You can use a daemon process as a > JUMP driver (as TCP/IP do). The only problem that can arise is that it > will slow down the link (assuming JUMP is a sincronous protocol - an > asincronous prot

Re: hardware question

2000-09-27 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Gerrit van den Berg wrote: > Hi, > > I want to include the PS2 mouse with the PC keyboard. I have the SW > for the mouse in digital data style. What are the pulses in Forward, > Back, Left & Right pins 1, 2, 3, & 4 of the MSX analogic mouse? With > this info I can finish the

Re: Good news/Bad news

2000-09-15 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Sander Zuidema wrote: > Hello everybody, > > First the good news: I have more than 100 V9958 chips sold. Everyone who has > ordered will get details by the end of this week. Cool! > The bad news: I'm currently rather ill, so I'm afraid I will > not be able to go to Zandv..

Re: News from the CTNG lab :-)

2000-09-14 Thread B. Wijnen
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Jon De Schrijder wrote: > The assembly process will also be much faster since the code is already > assembled as much as possible when you are editing. Exact timing results > are not known yet, but I've already measured 2 seconds for Pass1 of a > source of 8000 lines without

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-12 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Laurens Holst wrote: > > Yes, a timeout is needed for such situations. But as long as the other > > side is connected (and running an os with JUMP drivers), everything should > > be ok and no locks are possible. > > You should _never_ assume that... One flawd bit on the ack l

Re: The MSX Z80 assembler

2000-09-12 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > On Fri, 08 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > > > Who need numbers in an arbitrary base anyway? Hexadecimal, decimal and > > > binary are enough. Octal is supported by many languages, but it is rarely > > > used in practice (the only use I know is Unix file

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-08 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > > > For Linux, the best solution would be to write a serial driver for > > > JoyNet. Then pppd can be used to connect to UZIX and you can use the > > > existing PPP network device. > > > > Not at all. Linux knows the `network driver' as a special ob

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-08 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > Error detection other than CRC. Under the assumption that there are only > 1-bit errors, the protocol itself can detect errors. I'm not sure this > assumption is correct, but gathering statistical evidence (hours of testing) > should tell us more

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-08 Thread B. Wijnen
I only replied to what I didn't agree with or what I had something to say about. Other things I cut out. On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > The protocol can be fixed: adding CRC and a timeout is sufficient. But I > think a more elegant solution is possible, where you wouldn't need

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-08 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > > Small numbers of cycles are not possible. But usually, the number of > > cycles needed is about 50 or 100. > > JoyNet singal propagation doesn't need waits that long. On 3.5MHz I got > speeds of about 3.5 kilobyte per second, that is 3500*8=2800

Re: The MSX Z80 assembler

2000-09-08 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > On Tue, 05 Sep 2000, you wrote: > > > The way numbers are written may be > > different. Here's how my assembler does it: > > starting with a number 0-9, a hexadecimal number is expected. > > starting with %, a decimal number is expected. > > starti

Re: The MSX Z80 assembler

2000-09-08 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, David Heremans wrote: > If you are reading sectors and you see each byte as octal you can read > Z80 ml much more easilly. > For example with 101 then you can see directly that it means "ld a,b" > The entire Z80 is verry octal based in its opcode structure. True, except that

Re: The MSX Z80 assembler

2000-09-05 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Laurens Holst wrote: > > For those of you who know sourceforge: I just started a new project there, > > called `the MSX Z80 assembler'. It is an opensource initiative to make a > > cross assembler with the MSX as target platform. Currently it is written > > in C, POSIX compian

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-05 Thread B. Wijnen
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > A ring scales just as well as a line: > > #nodes#cables:ring#cables:line > 2 2 1 > 3 3 2 > 4 4 3 > etc. Hmm, that is true indeed. > > > Another problem is the granularity o

The MSX Z80 assembler

2000-09-05 Thread B. Wijnen
Hi, For those of you who know sourceforge: I just started a new project there, called `the MSX Z80 assembler'. It is an opensource initiative to make a cross assembler with the MSX as target platform. Currently it is written in C, POSIX compiant I hope. I still need 2 things to be done though. I

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-04 Thread B. Wijnen
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > > > How can a node (single computer in the network) determine whether its > > > neighbours use JUMP or not? Especially, how can it do so without causing > > > problems with other protocols? > > > > It can't. It is impossible to determine. > > I don

Re: (Joynet protocol)

2000-09-01 Thread B. Wijnen
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote: > On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, you wrote: > > > 3. When JUMP should be used > > The term "JUMP" is not introduced... > JUMP = Joynet Univeral Message Protocol? Hmm did I forget that? sorry. It should be Joynet Unified Machine Protocol. I used this term to

RE: Sad news (V9958 and YM2431 orders)

2000-08-24 Thread B. Wijnen
> The euro exhange rate is not so good, 8 euro is closer to 9 euro. Still a > bargain. As long as it stays under 10 euro, I'll take 4 anyway :) Bye, main(){int c[4] ,x=4 ,l=getpid() ,i;; for( srand(l);c[ x]=- rand ()%6 ,x-- ;);; for( ;44> x;){ char a[9

Re: Sad news (V9958 and YM2431 orders)

2000-08-24 Thread B. Wijnen
> will be about 8 dollars. That's less than 8 euros, right? In that case, I want 4 :) > I currently have some orders yet, but only for 15 chips. > Still 85 to sell... Hmm, that't quite a lot... Let's see if we can reach it. Bye, main(){int c[4] ,x=4 ,l=getpid() ,i;; for( srand(l);c[

Joynet

2000-08-18 Thread B. Wijnen
oops, I forgot to describe the packet header. Well, we can discuss about that later anyway. I think this should be enough already for quite some time to fight about ;) Bye, main(){int c[4] ,x=4 ,l=getpid() ,i;; for( srand(l);c[ x]=- rand ()%6 ,x-- ;);; for( ;44>

No Subject

2000-08-18 Thread B. Wijnen
Hello, This is a pretty long mail, so I shall start by describing it and thus letting you know if you want to read on or not. This mail handles about joynet. I want there to be a standard protocol for communicating over joynet. In the introduction I shall talk about why and when this protocol sh

Re: Coding question

2000-04-25 Thread B. Wijnen
Hi, I shall put some comments in the assembly, if you don't agree with what I say, there's an error in the implementation (or a mistake on my side ;) > I have the following subroutine: > > ld hl,(table) ; load table into hl dynamic start of table: the start address is kept at address table > i