Hi,
As far as I know, the best way to make programs to detect an emulator,
is checking the VDP timing. So do a copy, and see how much time it takes
to finish. Something like that.
Bye,
shevek
On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 01:48:44PM +0100, Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
Hi all!
I wondered if there are
I hope UZIX doesn't crash from the buffer overrun?
It probably will. But buffer is in high memory area, just before MSX system
variables. A big buffer overrun will trash system vars and hangs MSX.
It should just drop the data I'd say. If you have TCP connections, that
should not be a
On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 05:19:45PM -0300, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
Well, of course you should do that as well. But if it gets ignored and
you receive data anyway, then this data should not overwrite anything
important. In the linux kernel this aproach would generate an
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 05:01:23AM -0300, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
Hi,
Anyone here knows the Z8530 Serial Controller Chip? I'm
working on a driver for it for UZIX, but I'm having a problem: clearing
the DTR bit (register 5) doesn't make the host stop sending
I have a pretty good photocopy (at least most of it is pretty good...)
I'll take it with me to Tilburg. Where can I find you?
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Hans Otten wrote:
Yes, with the right software (Finereader for example) ocr scanning is a very
mature solution of getting text into editable
Laurens Holst wrote:
I am manually entering the contents of the v9938 databook into a textfile.
just to let you know, in case someone else is also doing this.
current progress: page 11 of 161 (bareuh...).
This sounds like a very good initiative. But it will take a lot of (your)
time. Isn't
On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
I found that I need to hit the slot machine with 3
snatchers' head, then I can get pass the VIP room.
However, I can't do it! It is so hard to hit 3
snatchers' head in the slot machine.
The three snatcher heads are no coincidence: you
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Sean Young wrote:
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 03:50:07PM +, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
The MSX mailinglist server only checks for large messages, so small
attachments can slip through. The list is migrating to a different list
server program soon, hopefully with that
Ok, in this case we would want it to let it through, but I bet this filter
catches a lot of spam as well...
Bye,
shevek
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, by way of Maarten ter Huurne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
And sometimes the mailinglist filters too strong... The following message
from Eric Boon
On Wed, 22 Nov 2000, Alex Wulms wrote:
] Everything I know is that this bit was used by MegaSCSI in some
] some apps to "blink" the Kana Led (according to the program manuals).
So the answer is that the bit is used for the KANA led, to make it burn or
not burn.
Please remember you're
On Tue, 21 Nov 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
"0" for syllable layout; "1" for JIS layout
Syllable is not just letters, but special groups ("lettergrepen" in Dutch).
For example, "syllable" itself contains syllables "syl", "la" and "ble".
JIS is "Japanese International Standard",
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000, Daniel Jorge Caetano wrote:
On Mon, 20 Nov 2000 01:29:34 +0100, Sean Young wrote:
According to Portar.txt bit 6 of PSG register 14 is "On japanese machines only".
It's not the KANA led, that's bit 7 of PSG register 15. Does anyone know what
that bit does? The MSX
Hi,
Some time ago, I had a big mess on my desk which accidentally removed half
of my IDE cartridge from my msx (a philips nms8220). In the other slot I
had my gfx9000. I didn't notice, so I switched it on and didn't get
anything useful on the screen. So I checked it out and found the problem.
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, pepito sbazzeguti wrote:
Hello!
I've found on the net explaination about DES (Data Encryption Standard) and
I've implemented it in MSX-C.
Do you think a file de/crypter could be useful?
Sure. An encrypted filesystem would be even better, though ;)
Bye,
main(){int
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Gerrit van den Berg wrote:
Hi,
I want to include the PS2 mouse with the PC keyboard. I have the SW
for the mouse in digital data style. What are the pulses in Forward,
Back, Left Right pins 1, 2, 3, 4 of the MSX analogic mouse? With
this info I can finish the
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Adriano Camargo Rodrigues da Cunha wrote:
UZIX processes have priority. You can use a daemon process as a
JUMP driver (as TCP/IP do). The only problem that can arise is that it
will slow down the link (assuming JUMP is a sincronous protocol - an
asincronous
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000, Sander Zuidema wrote:
Hello everybody,
First the good news: I have more than 100 V9958 chips sold. Everyone who has
ordered will get details by the end of this week.
Cool!
The bad news: I'm currently rather ill, so I'm afraid I will
not be able to go to Zandv..
On Wed, 13 Sep 2000, Jon De Schrijder wrote:
The assembly process will also be much faster since the code is already
assembled as much as possible when you are editing. Exact timing results
are not known yet, but I've already measured 2 seconds for Pass1 of a
source of 8000 lines without
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Laurens Holst wrote:
Yes, a timeout is needed for such situations. But as long as the other
side is connected (and running an os with JUMP drivers), everything should
be ok and no locks are possible.
You should _never_ assume that... One flawd bit on the ack line
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, David Heremans wrote:
If you are reading sectors and you see each byte as octal you can read
Z80 ml much more easilly.
For example with 101 then you can see directly that it means "ld a,b"
The entire Z80 is verry octal based in its opcode structure.
True, except that 101
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
On Tue, 05 Sep 2000, you wrote:
The way numbers are written may be
different. Here's how my assembler does it:
starting with a number 0-9, a hexadecimal number is expected.
starting with %, a decimal number is expected.
starting with @,
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
Small numbers of cycles are not possible. But usually, the number of
cycles needed is about 50 or 100.
JoyNet singal propagation doesn't need waits that long. On 3.5MHz I got
speeds of about 3.5 kilobyte per second, that is 3500*8=28000 bits
I only replied to what I didn't agree with or what I had something to say
about. Other things I cut out.
On Wed, 6 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
The protocol can be fixed: adding CRC and a timeout is sufficient. But I
think a more elegant solution is possible, where you wouldn't need a
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
Error detection other than CRC. Under the assumption that there are only
1-bit errors, the protocol itself can detect errors. I'm not sure this
assumption is correct, but gathering statistical evidence (hours of testing)
should tell us more
On Fri, 8 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
For Linux, the best solution would be to write a serial driver for
JoyNet. Then pppd can be used to connect to UZIX and you can use the
existing PPP network device.
Not at all. Linux knows the `network driver' as a special object. I
Hi,
For those of you who know sourceforge: I just started a new project there,
called `the MSX Z80 assembler'. It is an opensource initiative to make a
cross assembler with the MSX as target platform. Currently it is written
in C, POSIX compiant I hope.
I still need 2 things to be done though.
On Tue, 5 Sep 2000, Laurens Holst wrote:
For those of you who know sourceforge: I just started a new project there,
called `the MSX Z80 assembler'. It is an opensource initiative to make a
cross assembler with the MSX as target platform. Currently it is written
in C, POSIX compiant I
On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
How can a node (single computer in the network) determine whether its
neighbours use JUMP or not? Especially, how can it do so without causing
problems with other protocols?
It can't. It is impossible to determine.
I don't think it's
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Maarten ter Huurne wrote:
On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, you wrote:
3. When JUMP should be used
The term "JUMP" is not introduced...
JUMP = Joynet Univeral Message Protocol?
Hmm did I forget that? sorry. It should be Joynet Unified Machine
Protocol. I used this term to
will be about 8 dollars.
That's less than 8 euros, right? In that case, I want 4 :)
I currently have some orders yet, but only for 15 chips.
Still 85 to sell...
Hmm, that't quite a lot... Let's see if we can reach it.
Bye,
main(){int c[4] ,x=4 ,l=getpid() ,i;; for( srand(l);c[
The euro exhange rate is not so good, 8 euro is closer to 9 euro. Still a
bargain.
As long as it stays under 10 euro, I'll take 4 anyway :)
Bye,
main(){int c[4] ,x=4 ,l=getpid() ,i;; for( srand(l);c[ x]=- rand
()%6 ,x-- ;);; for( ;44 x;){ char a[9]
Hello,
This is a pretty long mail, so I shall start by describing it and thus letting
you know if you want to read on or not.
This mail handles about joynet. I want there to be a standard protocol for
communicating over joynet. In the introduction I shall talk about why and
when this protocol
oops, I forgot to describe the packet header. Well, we can discuss about
that later anyway. I think this should be enough already for quite some
time to fight about ;)
Bye,
main(){int c[4] ,x=4 ,l=getpid() ,i;; for( srand(l);c[ x]=- rand
()%6 ,x-- ;);; for( ;44
Hi,
I shall put some comments in the assembly, if you don't agree with what I
say, there's an error in the implementation (or a mistake on my side ;)
I have the following subroutine:
ld hl,(table) ; load table into hl
dynamic start of table: the start address is kept at address table
inc
34 matches
Mail list logo
