> > Wasn't there a plan for this? The .msx format? A discussion WHICH
> > COMPLETELY DIED WITHOUT ANY RESULT! :-(
>
> Please be more patient. Standardising and then implementing takes a lot of
> time. MSX developers have studies or jobs and other projects going, so
> they're not always working
On Tuesday 05 June 2001 18:51, you wrote:
> Wasn't there a plan for this? The .msx format? A discussion WHICH
> COMPLETELY DIED WITHOUT ANY RESULT! :-(
Please be more patient. Standardising and then implementing takes a lot of
time. MSX developers have studies or jobs and other projects going,
On Tue, 5 Jun 2001 20:51:57 +0200 (MET DST), Manuel Bilderbeek wrote:
>> The description could also carry useful information for players, such as
>> required language.
>Wasn't there a plan for this? The .msx format? A discussion WHICH
>COMPLETELY DIED WITHOUT ANY RESULT! :-(
I think whenever R
> Actually I think there should be a standardized way of describing what
> each disk image (or rom image, or tape image) needs: MSX type, amount of
> memory, slot configuration, ROM-type, supported soundchips, ... That
> description should be computer-readable (something like XML would be great
>
