Re: MSX LUSERS (can't ye even spell that right?) -> Bad english??

Laurens Holst wrote: > > > Laurens Holst wrote: > > >> oh yeah, btw.. it's loser, not luser.. (didn't have no > > >> education eh??) > > > > >Jeez! English is terrible on this list! > > > > >People, it is LOOSERS and LAMERS. Not losers not lusers >nor lammers. > > > > Yeah, yeah, the lamer part I

Re: MSX LUSERS (can't ye even spell that right?) -> Bad english??

> Laurens Holst wrote: > >> oh yeah, btw.. it's loser, not luser.. (didn't have no > >> education eh??) > > >Jeez! English is terrible on this list! > > >People, it is LOOSERS and LAMERS. Not losers not lusers >nor lammers. > > Yeah, yeah, the lamer part I understand, butteh, it's > loser, and not

Re: MSX LUSERS (can't ye even spell that right?) -> Bad english??

hiya... Laurens Holst wrote: >> oh yeah, btw.. it's loser, not luser.. (didn't have no >> education eh??) >Jeez! English is terrible on this list! >People, it is LOOSERS and LAMERS. Not losers not lusers >nor lammers. Yeah, yeah, the lamer part I understand, butteh, it's loser, and not looser,