Re: Pa3 engine

2000-06-03 Thread Rieks W. Torringa
>I've followed the gams discussion now and decided not to make the PA3 >engine pd (sorry manuel, maybe I can write some other articles for mccw). I >rather spent my time on RoA than writing an extensive course that likely >no-one will use actively. Maybe it's not a bad i

Re: Pa3 engine

2000-06-03 Thread Mari van den Broek
>Aww SHIT! >Please people, try to let Peter reconsider! Stop complaining Manuel. I think Peter is right. If he doesn't want to share his sources, we can't make him do that! By the way, are the sources of your programs available for everybody who wants to take a look at i

Re: Pa3 engine

2000-06-03 Thread Manuel Bilderbeek
> I've followed the gams discussion now and decided not to make the PA3 = > engine > pd (sorry manuel, maybe I can write some other articles for mccw). I = > rather > spent my time on RoA than writing an extensive course that likely no-one > will use actively. > &g

Re: Pa3 engine

2000-06-03 Thread Patrick 'Patsie' Lina
> > > http-equiv=3DContent-Type> > > > > > Hi,I've followed the gams = > discussion now=20 > and decided not to make the PA3 enginepd (sorry manuel, maybe I can = > write=20 > some other articles for mccw). I ratherspent my time on RoA than = > writing an=20 > extensive course that likely

Pa3 engine

2000-06-02 Thread Peter Meulendijks
Hi,I've followed the gams discussion now and decided not to make the PA3 enginepd (sorry manuel, maybe I can write some other articles for mccw). I ratherspent my time on RoA than writing an extensive course that likely no-onewill use actively.and I won't simply put the sources on-line for a