I thought it would be nice to not require users to have LWP::UserAgent installed
(like we don't require them to have Config::IniFiles - it's part of the MTT
repository), since LWP::UserAgent isn't listed as a standard module
(https://www.linuxnotes.net/perlcd/prog/ch32_01.htm). However, LWP::UserA
It might be ok to adapt the module to try to "include" it (vs. requiring
it) and if it's not there, fail over.
Make sense?
> -Original Message-
> From: mtt-users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:mtt-users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ethan Mallove
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 9:46
Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote On 07/17/06 10:13,:
> It might be ok to adapt the module to try to "include" it (vs. requiring
> it) and if it's not there, fail over.
>
> Make sense?
Do you mean adapt Perfbase.pm fail over if it can't find LWP::UserAgent? Or
adapt LWP::UserAgent to failover if
I would think it be acceptable that if LWP is not found, try to fail
over to some other mechanism (wget, etc.).
> -Original Message-
> From: mtt-users-boun...@open-mpi.org
> [mailto:mtt-users-boun...@open-mpi.org] On Behalf Of Ethan Mallove
> Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 10:45 AM
> To: Ge
