I'll have to wait until the machine is back unfortunately. They have
restricted logins until they are done with the hw testing. :(
On Oct 2, 2006, at 12:50 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Now worries -- could you send the --verbose output?
On 10/2/06 12:49 PM, "Josh Hursey" wrote:
I was running
Now worries -- could you send the --verbose output?
On 10/2/06 12:49 PM, "Josh Hursey" wrote:
> I was running with --verbose, but not --debug. I'll try that when the
> machine is back up on Wed.
>
> Has anyone else seen this behavior?
>
> Cheers,
> Josh
>
> On Oct 2, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Jeff S
I was running with --verbose, but not --debug. I'll try that when the
machine is back up on Wed.
Has anyone else seen this behavior?
Cheers,
Josh
On Oct 2, 2006, at 9:57 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Hrm. Well, the lack of "success=1" is why it didn't run, but then the
larger question becomes "w
Hrm. Well, the lack of "success=1" is why it didn't run, but then the
larger question becomes "why didn't it succeed?".
Do you have --verbose or --debug output for the build, perchance? If it
failed to build, there should be some output about it.
On 10/1/06 7:32 PM, "Josh Hursey" wrote:
> So
So I dug into this about as much as I can, and found that the v1.1
build seems to have completed successfully, but doesn't contain the
'success = 1' line. I attached the build dumps in case that helps
figure this one out.
ibm-build.tar.bz2
Description: Binary data
Any thoughts on why th
Has anyone been using MTT to test the v1.1 nightly?
I have been trying to run the [trivial,ibm] tests against
[trunk,v1.2,v1.1]. MTT will build all the sources and all the tests
with all the sources. It will then run the trivial tests against all
three sources, but only the ibm tests agains
