Re: [Multisync-devel] [PATCH] Bugs in opie plugin (attached this time)

2003-09-17 Thread Tom Foottit
Thanks for the patch. The declaration of the variable in the middle of the code block had been fixed (I should try compiling on gcc 2.X sometimes...) but I did apply your patch for the rweekdays problem to CVS. Thanks again. Tom On Thu, 2003-09-04 at 00:54, Steven Walter wrote: > The first pat

Re: [Multisync-devel] opie_sync

2003-09-17 Thread Tom Foottit
On Thu, 2003-09-11 at 04:49, Eike M. Lang wrote: > > Problem 2. When I first failed to connect, I thought it was caused by > > the port setting, therefore I try to leave the port filed empty. My > > guess is that this should be using default port. Click on sync, the log > > shows everything is OK,

Re: [Multisync-devel] Getting the syncml plugin to work with a syncml server

2003-09-17 Thread Bo Lincoln
Hello Mika, Nice to hear that you are working on it. As you have noticed, the syncml engine code is somewhat hard to follow. One of the main problems is that the SyncML standard suffers from the good ol' problem of being command-response-based, and it does not state how a server or client should r

Re: [Multisync-devel] Two way synchronization?

2003-09-17 Thread Bo Lincoln
> Debian ships libtool 1.5 nowdays, which breaks the build of multisync. > Either install libtool1.4, which probably will break a lot of other > stuff, or try this patch: > > http://www.pdc.kth.se/~torkel/msync.diff.gz Thank you very much! MultiSync is now upgraded to libtool 1.5 in CVS. /Bo -