Hi Bo & you others,
> Inclusion into core Gnome is another issue. I'm a happy Gnome user
> myself, but what about the rest of you? Somebody suggested a
> multisync-daemon and independent GUI, not to to tie up MultiSync to one
> desktop. Comments?
As I'm personally not a developer of multisyn
On Thu, Dec 04, 2003 at 09:32:13AM +0100, Bo Lincoln wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Yes, I agree we should definately have 0.82 release with bug fixes. I'm
> not sure about the help and internationalization features; since so much
> will have to be rewritten for 0.90 I would guess it's better to wait for
> t
Hi
nice idea :)
This could also be done using dbus, since it can transmit its messages
over a network.
So it would look like this: you have the multisync engine running on
your router and opened a port with dbus listening to your local network.
Then gui would then be started on your local pc, whi
Hi Marius
in the next mahor release (0.90) we plan to completly rewrite large
parts of multisync to overcome the design limitations of todays
multisync.
We plan to use DBus (http://www.freedesktop.org/Software/dbus) to
communicate between syncengine and plugins. Therefore you could write
plugins i
Hello!
Yes, I agree we should definately have 0.82 release with bug fixes. I'm
not sure about the help and internationalization features; since so much
will have to be rewritten for 0.90 I would guess it's better to wait for
those features until then.
Inclusion into core Gnome is another issue. I
One more thing that came to mind:
Make the plugins of an already started sync pair unchangeable. This
should reduce the risk that someone "reuses" and old sync pair and
misses syncs because of this.
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 15:35, Armin Bauer wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I will just summarize my thoughts about
Hi.
I will just summarize my thoughts about a roadmap where multisync might
go after 0.81
release 0.82:
bugfixes!
Help buttons?
Internationalization?
Inclusion into core gnome?
then we need to discuss what 0.90 should be capable to do and what it
should do it.
Ar
