[Multisync-users] iPaQ 4150 syncing

2004-04-15 Thread Joan Tur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo. I'm about to receive a brand new HP iPaQ 4150; it's got 802.11b + firewire built in. I've read about multisync working fine on an iPaQ 3970, so I expect it to work also fine on mine. If you'd like me to make tests on my iPaQ make me know. By

Re: [Multisync-users] Problem syncing P900 (syncml) via USB

2004-04-15 Thread Michael Below
Sorry for the delay... Vincent Frison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > In a previous thread, Dominik Schlösser have mentioned timeout issue. > Bob said the latest CVS releases has improvements regards to the > timeouts, so I have tried it (thanks to Packman for the Debian packages) > and the result

[Multisync-users] local client [evolution-sync] failed to load

2004-04-15 Thread Lon Canaday
Hi, I just upgraded to multisync 0.82 and now when I start it I get an error message saying     "The local client [evolution-sync] has failed to load!" and the multisync gui reports that a plugin is missing. I was able to sync before the upgrade. I'm running RH9 with kernel 2.4.20-8 All of

[Multisync-users] Problems with NOKIA 6610

2004-04-15 Thread Sabbia
This is what happens with a Nokia 6610 on FedoraCore 1, Evolution 1.4.5, Multisync 0.82 1- I initialize the Irda port 2- I run Multisync 3- I do a test connection through Multisync: it properly finds the Nokia 6610 4- But when I try to SYNC, it generates an error ("Failed to get first plugin chang

Re: [Multisync-users] Closer, but still not quite there

2004-04-15 Thread Fries Kevin
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 10:36, Eike M. Lang wrote: >Am Do, den 15.04.2004 schrieb Fries Kevin um 08:15: > >> - Connection type is set to bluetooth, and I click on "Search for >> units..." > >> - Up pops a status dialog and after about 15 seconds or so I get an >> entry in the list that says "T610

[Multisync-users] iPaQ 4150 syncing

2004-04-15 Thread Joan Tur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hallo. I'm about to receive a brand new HP iPaQ 4150; it's got 802.11b + firewire built in. I've read about multisync working fine on an iPaQ 3970, so I expect it to work also fine on mine. If you'd like me to make tests on my iPaQ make me know.

Re: [Multisync-users] RE: Palm Plugin Feature Requests

2004-04-15 Thread Armin Bauer
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 16:54, Tayfun Can wrote: > > > > > 2. When I made a change to an existing record (ie. created before the > > > CVS palm_sync) in Evolution or Palm, it got duplicated after the sync, > > > ie. a new record created with the updated info. This does not happen if > > > the reco

Re: [Multisync-users] RE: Palm Plugin Feature Requests

2004-04-15 Thread Tayfun Can
> > 2. When I made a change to an existing record (ie. created before the > > CVS palm_sync) in Evolution or Palm, it got duplicated after the sync, > > ie. a new record created with the updated info. This does not happen if > > the record was created after the new palm_sync. > > do you have a

Re: [Multisync-users] RE: Palm Plugin Feature Requests

2004-04-15 Thread Tayfun Can
I built the palm-sync from CVS snapshot. I could not connect to the CVS. 1. There are no more null/garbage elements in "show in list". The available phone/e-mail info starts from the top of the list, which can cause duplicate labels. For example: The record in evolution has only "home" phone set.

Re: [Multisync-users] RE: Palm Plugin Feature Requests

2004-04-15 Thread Armin Bauer
On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 15:07, Tayfun Can wrote: > I built the palm-sync from CVS snapshot. I could not connect to the CVS. yeah... anon cvs on sourceforge sucks. > > 1. There are no more null/garbage elements in "show in list". The > available phone/e-mail info starts from the top of the list, wh

Re: [Multisync-users] Problem with Rpm's

2004-04-15 Thread Tom Foottit
$ rpm -qa *libgal* libgal2.0_6-1.99.11.0.200403160757-0.snap.ximian.6.1 libgal2.0_5-1.99.10.99.0.200402190759-0.snap.ximian.6.1 libgal21-0.23-1.ximian.6.6 libgal2.0-devel-1.99.11.0.200403160757-0.snap.ximian.6.1 libgal2.0_3-1.99.8-0.ximian.6.3 You are right. I had forgotten that I had upgraded som

Re: [Multisync-users] Problem with Rpm's

2004-04-15 Thread Christoph Wickert
I'm having issues with 0.82 on Fedora Core 1, too: Am Di, den 13.04.2004 schrieb Tom Foottit um 16:42: > Can you check /usr/local/lib/multisync to make sure that > libevolution_sync.so is there and then, and then run 'ldd > libevolution_sync.so' to make sure that there are no missing libraries. >

Re: [Multisync-users] Closer, but still not quite there

2004-04-15 Thread Eike M. Lang
Am Do, den 15.04.2004 schrieb Fries Kevin um 08:15: > - Connection type is set to bluetooth, and I click on "Search for > units..." > - Up pops a status dialog and after about 15 seconds or so I get an > entry in the list that says "T610 (00:0A:D9:80:61:8B) - No IrMC > Synchronization" Try s