HI,
Talking about "perfect noise", you may want to consider these theoretics:
- what do you do near the Niquist frequency ? Or more practical: noise that gets near
the NF will probably cause strange effects in practical DACs and when the digital signal
is to be interpreted as "perfectly re-co
Dude is called Nyquist, and noise is not generally uncorrelated. White noise
usually is. Pink noise is not.
> On 14 Apr 2016, at 15:12 , Theo Verelst wrote:
>
> HI,
>
> Talking about "perfect noise", you may want to consider these theoretics:
>
> - what do you do near the Niquist frequency ?
Maybe stupid question: Is pink noise inherently correlated or is this a
property of the algorithms currently in use?
-Seth
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 7:11 AM Stefan Stenzel <
stefan.sten...@waldorfmusic.de> wrote:
> Dude is called Nyquist, and noise is not generally uncorrelated. White
> noise usua
Any noise other than white noise is correlated, by definition. That's what
"white noise" means - uncorrelated. Correlation in the time domain is
equivalent to non-constant shape in the frequency domain.
Ethan
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Seth Nickell wrote:
> Maybe stupid question: Is pink
Original Message
Subject: Re: [music-dsp] High quality really broad bandwidth pinknoise (ideally
more than 32 octaves)
From: "Ethan Duni"
Date: Thu, April 14, 2016 4:09 pm
To: "A discussion list for music-related DSP"
I came across unums a couple weeks back, which seem to be a plausibe
replacement for floating point (pros and cons to it vs floating point).
One interesting thing is that division is that addition, subtraction,
multiplication and division are all single flop operations and are on
"equal footing".
It looks like it stopped archiving messages last july:
http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/
___
dupswapdrop: music-dsp mailing list
music-dsp@music.columbia.edu
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
Apologies if this is a double post. I believe my last email was in
HTML format so was likely rejected. I checked the list archives but
they seem to have stopped updating as of last year, so posting again
in plain text mode!
I came across unums a couple weeks back, which seem to be a plausible
re
We switched to a new server a year ago. The footer at the bottom of each
email has the correct address for the archives:
https://lists.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/music-dsp
best,
douglas
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Alan Wolfe wrote:
> It looks like it stopped archiving messages last
ah ok thanks.
This list has been around a long while hehe.
http://music.columbia.edu/cmc/music-dsp/musicdsparchives.html points
to http://music.columbia.edu/pipermail/music-dsp/
but apparently the real one is here in the email.
maybe we should update that first link or something? not a biggie
Interesting, thanks for pointing it out (and yes, your first message made it
here—the list is more forgiving about html text formatting these days).
> Interesting stuff, so i was curious if anyone here on the list has heard of
> them, has used them for dsp, etc?
I’m thinking it’s not likely th
11 matches
Mail list logo
