> -- OR--
>
> [artist] performed {instrument} as member of [artist]
> (no reverse link phrase?)
>
> [artist] performed {vocal} as member of [artist]
> (no reverse link phrase?)
>
> (g0llum could you come up with a reverse phrase please?)
The reverse phrase is even easier, I think:
[artist b
I agree with earlier comments that we don't need to duplicate the artist
information here. Other than that, I prefer the second option.
Cristov (wolfsong)
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ZaphodBeeblebrox formerly known as mo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [mb-style] R
as this has been in limbo for a whole week I now ask for additional input and
veto:
we currently have
[artist] is/was a{additional:n additional} {instrument} performing member of
[artist]
[artist] has/had {instrument} performing member [artist]
[artist] is/was a{additional:n additional} {vocal
On Mar 6, 2006, at 12:57 PM, Robert Kaye wrote:
I'm currently mulling it over -- I'll re-read the threads and figure
out our next step later today/tomorrow.
OK, that obviously didn't happen. :-(
Just to let you know, its near the top of my TODO list and you will
hear from me on this soon.
