Simon Reinhardt wrote:
I would prefer a general type which can mean both simple name changes
and name changes combined with line-up / style changes (I don't like
that style thing though since it is subjective, so I don't think it
should go into the style description for that type).
First of
Bogdan Butnaru wrote:
That said, those using GMail don't really need this: all replies to a
mail are grouped under a conversation. I have a label which is
attached automatically (or manualy sometimes) to everything related to
MB, which works like a folder. I click on it and see all subjects, and
Simon Reinhardt wrote:
I must admit it was a bit hot when I wrote that and after it I
thought: hmmm.. that's all bullshit. I think you're right, one general
type probably won't work. I have a real life example for you:
I just thought about other real-life examples when I had another idea:
we
Don Redman wrote:
The benefit over a tracker is that [...] this fits better to the
nature of style issues and the way the Style Council works.
Agreed. But in my opinion the main benefit of the tracker we were
discussing was automatic creation of summaries of lengthy discussions. I
like your
