> off topic: then we'd turn into discogs, and be useless for tagging,
> IMO. i don't see the 2 projects having a useful middle ground, though
> i love both for what they do.
This is an interesting viewpoint. But the goal is IMO clear, to put together
a comprehensive music database, and tagging on
On 21/06/06, Stefan Kestenholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> define 'people' :P i don't want to see my albums change name depending
> on what particular package i got them in. i want the album field of my
what did we say about just yesterday bout the "i don't want this in my
tags" arguments? you
