Re: [mb-style] RFV: How to handle band/artist name changes

2006/11/6, Lauri Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 11/6/06, Age Bosma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kerensky97 wrote: Add me as another person who really likes this idea but not the wording of "legal". [...] Who are the other people who don't like the wording of 'legal'? ;-) Me and Freso at least.

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Translation Transliteration Relationship Type

The Pseudo-Release type is implemented and live on test.mb.org. On Nov 6, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Don Redman wrote: On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:15:33 +0100, Alexander Dupuy wrote: Anyhow - no need for a new RFV on this - as I was the only one objecting strongly to the attribute, we can add it provision

Re: [mb-style] WikiDocs for StyleGuidelines?

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 22:21:11 +0100, Age Bosma wrote: Would this be worth the work? I think it will. We have the system in place so why not us it to the fullest. It would sure fit nicely in the current discussion on the forum about changing and improving the RFC/RFV process [1]. I do, h

Re: [mb-style] WikiDocs for StyleGuidelines?

Don Redman wrote: OK, here is a simple idea: I have observed that people who propose _new_ guidelines or AR types create a wiki page and work the changes in. This makes it easy to make an RFV at the end. It's nothing more than: Should we make that page official? People who want to change a

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Translation Transliteration Relationship Type

On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:15:33 +0100, Alexander Dupuy wrote: Anyhow - no need for a new RFV on this - as I was the only one objecting strongly to the attribute, we can add it provisionally, and remove it once the server support on updated album page makes it obsolete. Done:

[mb-style] WikiDocs for StyleGuidelines?

OK, here is a simple idea: I have observed that people who propose _new_ guidelines or AR types create a wiki page and work the changes in. This makes it easy to make an RFV at the end. It's nothing more than: Should we make that page official? People who want to change a guideline have a h

[mb-style] RFC: How to handle band/artist name changes (Was a RFV)

On Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:07:03 +0100, Age Bosma wrote: Kerensky97 wrote: Add me as another person who really likes this idea but not the wording of "legal". If we can just think of a different way to word it I think it would be great. Who are the other people who don't like the wording of '

Re: [mb-style] RFV: How to handle band/artist name changes

On 11/6/06, Age Bosma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kerensky97 wrote: > Add me as another person who really likes this idea but not the wording of > "legal". If we can just think of a different way to word it I think it > would be great. > Who are the other people who don't like the wording of 'le

Re: [mb-style] RFV: How to handle band/artist name changes

Kerensky97 wrote: Add me as another person who really likes this idea but not the wording of "legal". If we can just think of a different way to word it I think it would be great. Who are the other people who don't like the wording of 'legal'? ;-) Offtopic: RFV already? Yeah, there was n