RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread mll
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Marco Sola > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:52 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY' > > mll wrote: > > >>> 1) 'Mazurka

RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread mll
> -Original Message- > From: Frederic Da Vitoria > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:09 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY' > > > > > Or even Mazurka No. 1/Op. 63 > > No, silly me. The number here is actually a

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Andrew Conkling
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Aaron Cooper wrote: > Doesn't 63/1 mean that the work has two different catalog numbers? Well, not always: MB uses "Hob III/28" (although far from consistently), which according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_string_quartets_by_Jose

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Leiv Hellebø
Aaron Cooper wrote: On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marco Sola wrote: > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not > part of this rule that is only about commas? > Spontaneous

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Marco Sola wrote: > > > > > > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: 2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Marco Sola wrote: > > > > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > > > around: are they allowed? should th

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Frederic Da Vitoria
2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marco Sola wrote: > > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not > > part of this rule that i

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Marco Sola
mll wrote: 1) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' OR 2) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63, No. 1' Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not part of this rule that is only about commas? 3) 'Mazurka in B m

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Aaron Cooper
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Marco Sola wrote: > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not > part of this rule that is only about commas? > Spontaneously, I'd say, no, they

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Andrew Conkling
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) Two acceptable forms is (are?) one more than is needed. 2) Having two will surely be confusing to some, especially new users. We risk getting multi-disc releases which are internally or series-wise inconsistent. 3) For those who'd like to se

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Leiv Hellebø
Marco Sola wrote: Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1' around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not part of this rule that is only about commas? Spontaneously, I'd say, no, they should not be allowed, and, yes, the existing ones shou

RE: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread mll
> -Original Message- > From: Marco Sola > Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:55 PM > To: MusicBrainz style discussion > Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY' > > Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM > mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: > > > the case whe

Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Marco Sola
Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto: the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example at http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html). I can see to ways of expressing it: 1) 'Ma

Re: [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Aaron Cooper
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: mll wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide > (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is > numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example > at http://musi

Re: [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Leiv Hellebø
mll wrote: Hi all, I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example at http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html). I

Re: [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Rob Keeney
I prefer (1) as well. Rob Pianissimo84 On 11/27/06, mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No.

Re: [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread Andrew Conkling
On 11/27/06, mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can see to ways of expressing it: 1) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' OR 2) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63, No. 1' I personnaly favour 1), what's your take? I say 1 also. For what it's worth, there was some editing discussion that spawned this mess

[mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'

2006-11-27 Thread mll
Hi all, I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example at http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html). I can see to w