> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Marco Sola
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 9:52 PM
> To: MusicBrainz style discussion
> Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'
>
> mll wrote:
>
> >>> 1) 'Mazurka
> -Original Message-
> From: Frederic Da Vitoria
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 10:09 PM
> To: MusicBrainz style discussion
> Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'
>
> >
> > Or even Mazurka No. 1/Op. 63
>
> No, silly me. The number here is actually a
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Aaron Cooper wrote:
> Doesn't 63/1 mean that the work has two different catalog numbers?
Well, not always:
MB uses "Hob III/28" (although far from consistently), which according to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_string_quartets_by_Jose
Aaron Cooper wrote:
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marco Sola wrote:
>
> Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1'
> around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not
> part of this rule that is only about commas?
>
Spontaneous
2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> 2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Marco Sola wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka
2006/11/27, Frederic Da Vitoria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Marco Sola wrote:
> > >
> > > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1'
> > > around: are they allowed? should th
2006/11/27, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Marco Sola wrote:
> >
> > Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1'
> > around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not
> > part of this rule that i
mll wrote:
1) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1'
OR
2) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63, No. 1'
Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op.
63/1' around:
are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not
part of this rule that is only about commas?
3) 'Mazurka in B m
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Marco Sola wrote:
>
> Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1'
> around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not
> part of this rule that is only about commas?
>
Spontaneously, I'd say, no, they
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1) Two acceptable forms is (are?) one more than is needed.
2) Having two will surely be confusing to some, especially new users. We
risk getting multi-disc releases which are internally or series-wise
inconsistent.
3) For those who'd like to se
Marco Sola wrote:
Just be aware that there's a lot of 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63/1'
around: are they allowed? should they be changed? are they simply not
part of this rule that is only about commas?
Spontaneously, I'd say, no, they should not be allowed, and, yes, the
existing ones shou
> -Original Message-
> From: Marco Sola
> Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 7:55 PM
> To: MusicBrainz style discussion
> Subject: Re: [mailing] [mb-style] 'Op. XX No. YY' or 'Op. XX, No. YY'
>
> Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM
> mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
>
> > the case whe
Il Monday, November 27, 2006 6:47 PM
mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ha scritto:
the case where a track is numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B
major, Op. 63
No. 1' (example at
http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html).
I can see to ways of expressing it:
1) 'Ma
On 11/27/06, Leiv Hellebø <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mll wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide
> (http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is
> numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example
> at http://musi
mll wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide
(http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is
numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example
at http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html).
I
I prefer (1) as well.
Rob
Pianissimo84
On 11/27/06, mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide
(http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is
numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No.
On 11/27/06, mll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can see to ways of expressing it:
1) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1'
OR
2) 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63, No. 1'
I personnaly favour 1), what's your take?
I say 1 also.
For what it's worth, there was some editing discussion that spawned
this mess
Hi all,
I'd like to fill a hole in ClassicalStyleGuide
(http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/ClassicalStyleGuide): the case where a track is
numbered 'Op. XX No. YY', like 'Mazurka in B major, Op. 63 No. 1' (example
at http://musicbrainz.org/track/576a7830-8240-4611-804c-256ee0e4bce3.html).
I can see to w
18 matches
Mail list logo