On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:35 PM, Aaron Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 26-Mar-08, at 8:19 AM, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> > Aaron's suggestion a month ago still makes quite some
> > sense to me.
>
> This discussion has gotten so overblown that I don't even remember
> what this suggestio
On 26-Mar-08, at 8:19 AM, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Aaron's suggestion a month ago still makes quite some
> sense to me.
This discussion has gotten so overblown that I don't even remember
what this suggestion was! Any chance you could restate it for us? :)
-Aaron
___
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Leiv Hellebo wrote:
>> The issuing label, Arte Nova - which
>> is a budget label with good theft (at least they had at the time)
Oh my :( The Norwegian "teft" translates to "flair". Sorry.
> A couple of questions:
>
> 1. Can we agree
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Brian Schweitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good point. I'm not familiar with that license, or most of the others
> you're thinking of; any chance you could help out with a list of them,
> so we have them available to implement in a drop down?
>
Yes, it shou
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:38 PM, Philipp Wolfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Brian Schweitzer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Either add the creative commons licensing options as checkbox +
> > dropdown options under the current "has coverart" AR, or as a
> >
On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 11:49 PM, Brian Schweitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Either add the creative commons licensing options as checkbox +
> dropdown options under the current "has coverart" AR, or as a
> fallback, add a new AR type for cc licensed coverart.
>
I generally would like to see
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Brian Schweitzer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Could we
> simply strike the current #1 of BSNS, and replace it with wording such
> as
>
> "Not all releases which could possibly be described as a 'box set'
> should be entered. Please see [What Defines a Uniqu
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Brian Schweitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Brian Schweitzer
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > But yes, I am in favor of merging away
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> > It's that "intent that something be a release" that I think matters.
>
> You quoted dmppanda earlier saying:
>
>
> Such discs (when considered independently from the nice paper around)
> *are
+1
Brian Schweitzer schreef:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Brian Schweitzer
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> But yes, I am in favor of merging away only the class Oliver described
>>> as "b
On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 10:26 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Brian Schweitzer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But yes, I am in favor of merging away only the class Oliver described
> > as "bundles". A box set has a unique identity, packagi
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> It's that "intent that something be a release" that I think matters.
You quoted dmppanda earlier saying:
Such discs (when considered independently from the nice paper around)
*are exactly the same as the standalone* (same packaging, same
discids, obviously same pweeds, s
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Brian Schweitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But yes, I am in favor of merging away only the class Oliver described
> as "bundles". A box set has a unique identity, packaging,
> discographic relevance, etc. A "bundle" only has an identity at all
> because some
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Brian Schweitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 9:23 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 1:50 PM, Lauri Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > But cover art includes the title on the front, a
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Wed, M
On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On 26/03/2008,
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> What you're describing is what most depictions here have still
> described as a box set. Question: Would the Mozart "White Box" set
> be what you're describing? It's quite clearly defined and sold as a
> box, though Naxos does still have the individual CD cat #'s on th
Brian omitted one point Chris B was making which I happen to agree on:
"we're going over the same points again and again. at this point you
have to reword your RFC to specifically address non-bundles, or accept
that we don't all agree on this issue."
I think this is needed,
though I agree with Br
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:14 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > The only one I ca
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Andrew Conkling
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Brian Schweitzer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> >
> > > Th
On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > The only one I can see my agreeing to merge away as is directed by
> > these guidelines is #1.
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
You're WAY out of line.
yes ;)
___
Musicbrainz-style mailing list
Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 6:03 AM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't care to answer your rather uninteresting remarks regards myself
> and my practice, and please do trawl my edits and edit notes, I believe
> you won't find many of those suggestions.
>
> As for your shiftyness, I h
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 11:08 PM, Brian Schweitzer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 5:57 AM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> > The tracklists, when we have identified earlier
> > > releases, do match entirely. But this is all irrelev
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 5:51 AM, Chris B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only one I can see my agreeing to merge away as is directed by
> these guidelines is #1. But the wording of the guidelines - esp the
> BSNS version - dependin
I don't care to answer your rather uninteresting remarks regards myself
and my practice, and please do trawl my edits and edit notes, I believe
you won't find many of those suggestions.
As for your shiftyness, I hope this is clearer: "Fuck you"
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Now I also would take is
On 26/03/2008, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The only one I can see my agreeing to merge away as is directed by
these guidelines is #1. But the wording of the guidelines - esp the
BSNS version - depending on your interpretation of them, can and is
being used to get rid of the other
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Leiv Hellebo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> >> > Instead, what's being done is, one by one as the discs are being
> >> > entered by a different editor, other editors are trying to ID what the
> >> > original release of that single disc
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>> > Instead, what's being done is, one by one as the discs are being
>> > entered by a different editor, other editors are trying to ID what the
>> > original release of that single disc was, and the adding editor then
>> > is being "encouraged" to rename that single di
30 matches
Mail list logo
