Re: [mb-style] DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases

2009-07-18 Thread Jan van Thiel
2009/7/16 meindu...@nurfuerspam.de: I'd like to re-open the discussion here whether this sentence shall be removed from the guideline or not. +1 for removal. Jan ___ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org

Re: [mb-style] RFV: PartNumberStyle (second attempt)

2009-07-18 Thread Aaron Cooper
A couple quick questions: 1. Why TrackTitle, Parts 1, 3 5 and TrackTitle, Parts 1–3, 5? To be consistent, shouldn't we do TrackTitle, Parts 1, 3, 5 and TrackTitle, Parts 1–3, 5? 2. Why TrackTitle, Parts One, Three – Five instead of TrackTitle, Parts One Three – Five? -cooperaa On Fri,