2009/8/6 MeinDummy
> The RFC was posted on July 22nd and no-one objected:
>
> http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2009-July/008150.html
> [mb-style] RFC: DiscogsRelationshipType and pending Discogs releases
>
Yes
Toni/t0n3t
___
Mu
+1
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Mark Woodson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:17 AM, MeinDummy wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending
> releases
> > from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from
> > http://musicbrainz.org/doc
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 4:17 AM, MeinDummy wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases
> from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc:
> DiscogsRelationshipType and from
> http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MeinDummy pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases
> from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc:
> DiscogsRelationshipType
2009/8/6 MeinDummy :
>
> Hi,
>
> I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases
> from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from
> http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc:
> DiscogsRelationshipType and from
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Disc
Hi,
I propose to delete the phrase 'Do not add relationships to pending releases
from Discogs. You never know if they get accepted.' from
http://musicbrainz.org/doc/Discogs_Relationship_Type Doc:
DiscogsRelationshipType and from
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Discogs_Relationship_Type Wiki:
Disco
