On Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:39:32 +0100, Brian Schweitzer
wrote:
> This proposal has been stalled for a year or so now, and the
> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/AudioBook_Style still is unofficial (and the
> wikipage is in need of some serious attention). Fridtjof or anyone else
> willing to get
Kuno Woudt-2 wrote:
>
> For example, I agree with this bit:
>
>The ReleaseAttribute for actual game CDs which have both data and
>audio tracks should be Other; for all others, including game rips, it
>should be Soundtrack.
>
> But I've seen a large amount of users use Soundtrack fo
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Bram van Dijk
wrote:
> Sorry for not being clear enough.
>
> The problem:
> -An autoeditor adds an AR (track/release/whatever) by mistake
> -The edit is applied at once
> -Removing the mistaken AR is not an autoedit
>
Just a tip, if this happens don't submit an
Sorry for not being clear enough.
The problem:
-An autoeditor adds an AR (track/release/whatever) by mistake
-The edit is applied at once
-Removing the mistaken AR is not an autoedit
-If this proposal goes through, there have to be three votes in favor of
removing this AR (track/release/w
On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 10:03 -0500, Pavan Chander wrote:
> On an unrelated note, since everyone seems to be giving their "+1"s
> now what will be the purpose of going through the RF*V* :)
It's just a formality? Presumably, nobody should veto it? :)
Paul
_
On Dec 11, 2009, at 10:03, Pavan Chander wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Bram van Dijk
> wrote:
> So, in addition to this proposal, I would ask for a possibility for
> autoeditors to cancel their edits.
>
>
> Auto-editors cannot cancel their edits because an auto-edit doesn't have t
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>> Ok. I believe this RFC (and the RFV as well, of course) should be further
>>
> split in pre-NGS and post-NGS, because I don't think
>
>> it would be a good idea to have people vote (or rather not-veto ;-) )
>>
> something which will not happen before probably
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Bram van Dijk wrote:
> I'd like to propose a small extension of this proposal.
>
> Why?
> Autoeditors cannot cancel their edits, as they are automatically accepted.
> So, it can be quite a pain if you make a small mistake that you need to get
> three people to vot
I'd like to propose a small extension of this proposal.
Why?
Autoeditors cannot cancel their edits, as they are automatically accepted.
So, it can be quite a pain if you make a small mistake that you need to get
three people to vote in favor of the removal of a wrong AR for example.
So,
+1
Brian Schweitzer wrote:
>
> Ok, how about this version?
>
> Make these non-expiring, passing only if they eventually have a 3:0, 3:1,
> or
> 3:2 vote:
> * Remove Release
> * Remove Release Event(s)
> * Remove Releases
> * Remove Track
> * Remove Relationship
>
> Make
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 06:05:25AM -0500, Brian Schweitzer wrote:
> Just a follow up; Musical Soundtrack Style and Game Soundtrack Style would
> also fall into the same category as the first two proposals here, and both
> also are just about universally used, if also not official.
I edit a fair am
2009/12/10 jacobbrett
>
>
> Kuno Woudt-2 wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hello members of the StyleCouncil!
> >
> > The first version of the Titles page for the Post NGS Style Guidelines
> > is done. Please have a look and send me your feedback (feel free to
> > reply here on mb-devel, edit the discussion pa
12 matches
Mail list logo
