On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Frederic Da Vitoria
wrote:
> 2010/11/17 Simon Austin
>>
>> Is there a way to tell PUIDs apart? I suspect one or more of these is
>> mis-applied, but I'm not sure how to work out which
>>
>>
>> http://musicbrainz.org/show/puid/?puid=4f91eadd-92a2-377f-d27e-7eb8714
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 1:14 PM, Jeroen Latour wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> While discussing the RFC to add a Writer AR Type, it became clear that the
> guidelines we were discussing applied equally to other 'generic' AR types.
> In fact, the fact that these guidelines were specified only for the Wr
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 23:44:17 +0530, Jeroen Latour
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> While discussing the RFC to add a Writer AR Type, it became clear that
> the
> guidelines we were discussing applied equally to other 'generic' AR
> types.
> In fact, the fact that these guidelines were specified on
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:24 PM, SwissChris wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
>
>> On 11/17/2010 02:06 PM, SwissChris wrote:
>> > I think we should add at least a warning that the use of such special
>> > punctuation Characters is language specific and should not b
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:25 PM, Alex Mauer wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 02:06 PM, SwissChris wrote:
> > I think we should add at least a warning that the use of such special
> > punctuation Characters is language specific and should not be changed
> > according to english rules in other languages if
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 21:48:40 +0100, SwissChris
wrote:
> ideally the UI for works would show:
> Work name / composer / (eventually writer/lyricist/librettist) / *number
> of
> recordings linked to this work *(this would already allow to disambiguate
> the standard track from the obscure one wi
2010/11/17 Simon Austin
> Is there a way to tell PUIDs apart? I suspect one or more of these is
> mis-applied, but I'm not sure how to work out which
>
> http://musicbrainz.org/show/puid/?puid=4f91eadd-92a2-377f-d27e-7eb8714efbd5
>
I believe they could both be correct :-( IIUC, PUIDs use the beg
On 11/17/2010 02:06 PM, SwissChris wrote:
> I think we should add at least a warning that the use of such special
> punctuation Characters is language specific and should not be changed
> according to english rules in other languages if one isn't absolutely
> certain of what he does.
This guidelin
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:50 AM, symphonick wrote:
>
> > Q1. Should a work be disambiguated via composer/lyricist/librettist, via
> > recording artist, or by work comment?
> >
> I think composer would work best. But it would be great if the UI could
> display 3-5 of tho most popular (tagged?) re
Is there a way to tell PUIDs apart? I suspect one or more of these is
mis-applied, but I'm not sure how to work out which
http://musicbrainz.org/show/puid/?puid=4f91eadd-92a2-377f-d27e-7eb8714efbd5
- Si (chiark)
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
Musi
I think we should add at least a warning that the use of such special
punctuation Characters is language specific and should not be changed
according to english rules in other languages if one isn't absolutely
certain of what he does. A link to the language specific
CapitalizationStandard guideline
In light of the recent discussion[1] about the removal of the
special-character bans from the miscellaneous guideline, I’ve created a
proposal[2] to update it. This proposal removes the current preference
for simple ASCII quotation marks and ellipses, and adds a guide for the
use of various sp
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Kuno Woudt wrote:
> On 14/11/10 07:02, jacobbrett wrote:
>>>
>> I understand that, I think only "Character name" should be used whether
>> "Character name (real
>> person)" OR "Character name" is printed.
>
> I prefer whatever is on the cover, even if that is "Cha
Hi everyone,
While discussing the RFC to add a Writer AR Type, it became clear that the
guidelines we were discussing applied equally to other 'generic' AR types.
In fact, the fact that these guidelines were specified only for the Writer
AR was one of the points blocking the proposal.
I have creat
48 hours have passed and so has this! Thanks everyone, I'll go create
the artist and move the wiki page and stuff now.
Nikki
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicb
> Q1. Should a work be disambiguated via composer/lyricist/librettist, via
> recording artist, or by work comment?
>
I think composer would work best. But it would be great if the UI could
display 3-5 of tho most popular (tagged?) recordings.
> Q2. What is your rationale for this?
>
Recording a
Hi,
here are a few examples where separate releases were created:
http://musicbrainz.org/release/faf6e719-534d-46d8-8232-5840bd10974c.html
http://musicbrainz.org/release/9a2383b3-6e80-4d8d-8950-fed57e71f1ec.html
http://musicbrainz.org/release/6d108898-ff45-434d-8b77-02d1a4f95d36.html
There are cu
17 matches
Mail list logo
