Re: [mb-style] RFV: Prefer Specific Relationship Types

2010-12-19 Thread Brian Schweitzer
Not to cause issues, Nikki, but this RFV was passed without response to my email of Dec 17: "+1 on the RFV. Just taking a last look, one trivial thing popped out at me... One of the three examples specifically talks about the Writer AR. Maybe final passage of this RFV should be contingent upon

Re: [mb-style] RFC-296: Change "Country" terminology to "Location"

2010-12-19 Thread Brian Schweitzer
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 1:24 PM, SwissChris wrote: > Sorry, no. Anything you propose will not do. We mean the top geographical entity just below "continent" and above "state", "province" > etc., and this entity is called "country" (and there are no possible synonyms that will be correctly underst

Re: [mb-style] RFC-296: Change "Country" terminology to "Location"

2010-12-19 Thread SwissChris
Sorry, no. Anything you propose will not do. We *mean* the top geographical entity just below "continent" and above "state", "province" etc., and this entity is called "country" (and there are no possible synonyms that will be correctly understood). So using "location" or "place" or whatever, just

Re: [mb-style] RFC-296: Change "Country" terminology to "Location"

2010-12-19 Thread Brian Schweitzer
Ok, given Nikki's email ( http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrainz-style/2010-December/010715.html ), I see it as imperative that we clarify just what this field, and this list, contains. Most specifically, this part is extremely troublesome to me: "Since I don't think it's relevant to

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Prefer Specific Relationship Types

2010-12-19 Thread Jeroen Latour
Hurray! Basing it off the Writer wording, what about: - Arranger: Where applicable, the instrumentator and/or orchestrator types should be used instead of the arranger type. For details, see the Prefer Specific Relationship Types guideline. - Engineer: In many cases, the Audio Enginee

Re: [mb-style] RFV: Prefer Specific Relationship Types

2010-12-19 Thread Nikki
Since 48 hours have passed without a veto, this has passed. I'll update the Advanced Relationship Style wiki page, but I'm not sure what text you wanted to be added to the other relationship pages. Nikki Jeroen Latour wrote: > Hi everyone, > > As all the active participants in the discussions h

Re: [mb-style] RFC3-290: Live Bootleg Style

2010-12-19 Thread Nikki
Brian Schweitzer wrote: > Ok, my apologies then, as that was my interpretation. > > Would this work for you? "The geopolitical entity below the country, > e.g. state, province, territory, etc." I typically see them called administrative divisions or administrative subdivisions, so I'd prefer