2011/5/20 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com
Now when we don't have to actually create collab. artists, would you
consider using say 2 composers as release artists instead of VA? Or has
this side effects I don't know about?
searched for a random release found
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Tjaijkovskij Bramhs is definitely better than VA IMO, although it tends to
suggest that the release contains some work composed by both. What would be
perfect (but will probably never happen) would be to be able to file a
Release under n Artists rather than only
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Tjaijkovskij Bramhs is definitely better than VA IMO, although it tends to
suggest that the release contains some work composed by both. What would be
perfect (but will probably never happen) would be
2011/5/20 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Tjaijkovskij Bramhs is definitely better than VA IMO, although it
tends to
suggest that the release contains some work composed by both. What would
be
On Fri, 20 May 2011 09:57:57 +0200, Nikki aei...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Tjaijkovskij Bramhs is definitely better than VA IMO, although it
tends to
suggest that the release contains some work composed by both. What
would be
perfect (but will probably never happen)
On Fri, 20 May 2011 10:10:45 +0200, Frederic Da Vitoria
davito...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/5/20 Lukáš Lalinský lalin...@gmail.com
I'd suggest / , as that's what we use to separate other things and
I'd like to start using it for tracks with multiple artists
Lukáš Lalinský wrote:
I'd suggest / , as that's what we use to separate other things and
I'd like to start using it for tracks with multiple artists
(http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/TracksWithMultipleArtists).
Exactly what I was thinking. I would use for tracks with multiple
artists and split
/ gets a +1 from me...
p
-Original Message-
From: musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org
[mailto:musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org] On Behalf Of Nikki
Sent: 20 May 2011 09:28
To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion
Subject: Re: [mb-style] CSG: Less VA?
Lukáš Lalinský
Aurélien Mino wrote:
It was planned to add Arranger at work level too after NGS migration,
exactly for this situation.
See
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Next_Generation_Schema/Track_Relationships_Conversion#Artist-Track
It just has not been added yet.
I thought the upgrades script would do
Per Starbäck wrote:
Are covers without lyrics its own work then? Like for instance
Yesterday with Oscar Peterson:
http://musicbrainz.org/recording/b0da13b6-12db-4391-9a2c-1dd26fb4cf3a
Hmm... Not sure. I think I would probably still use the original work,
the work still has lyrics even if
and vice versa you can say the work of a cover where lyrics where added still
has no lyrics. perfect solution imho would be an additional lyrics field
on recording lvl. however i guess i could live with an own work-entry and
work-work relationships in these cases although i personally won't credit
On 05/19/2011 08:47 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote:
Maybe reformulate the sentences using the date field for some ARs such as
composition. For example:
composed between and
But this would not solve the other issues. I think we need another field
here to choose the correct
Good people, can we finally move performers from the release title and to
the artist field?
Before:
Release title: Symphonie Fantastique / Le Corsaire (Royal Stockholm
Philharmonic Orchestra feat. conductor Gennady Rozhdestvensky)
Release artist: Hector Berlioz
Suggestion:
Release title:
how big has the percentage of (tracks by n)/(totaltracks) [or (playtime by
n)/(total playtime)] to be to justify an entry in the relase artist field?
eg. Being John Malkovich score
http://musicbrainz.org/release/15d15e38-08a2-4843-8af9-993dd5b399f5
is currently filed under Carter Burwell but has
I vote YES
2011/5/20 symphonick symphon...@gmail.com
Good people, can we finally move performers from the release title and to
the artist field?
Before:
Release title: Symphonie Fantastique / Le Corsaire (Royal Stockholm
Philharmonic Orchestra feat. conductor Gennady Rozhdestvensky)
On Fri, 20 May 2011 17:50:51 +0200, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net
wrote:
I think it could be done with a single checkbox, named something like
‘indefinite’.
start date + end date, no indefinite:
“from to ” or “in/on ” if they’re the same
start date + end date + indefinite:
On 05/20/2011 11:57 AM, caramel wrote:
From to Present
or Until are significant for a duration not to date an event (limited
in time)
You can already date an event by putting the same begin/end date.
The “indefinite” attribute would take care of the examples you cited:
If I enter
composer has moved to work and performer to recording level as far as is i
understood so is there no more way to mark these artist in their position on
release level? i hoped it would be possible with NGS to let the user pick
(for tagging purposes) which artist (performer, conductor, composer)
symphonick wrote:
We would still need extra dates for something that has been recorded say
7-11th may AND 24-26th of June.
Surely using two relationships solves that?
Nikki
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 6:27 PM, lorenz pressler l...@gmx.at wrote:
how big has the percentage of (tracks by n)/(totaltracks) [or (playtime by
n)/(total playtime)] to be to justify an entry in the relase artist field?
Enough they got their name on the cover.
eg. Being John Malkovich score
On Fri, 20 May 2011 18:57:41 +0200, lorenz pressler l...@gmx.at wrote:
composer has moved to work and performer to recording level as far as is
i
understood so is there no more way to mark these artist in their
position on
release level? i hoped it would be possible with NGS to let the
On Fri, 20 May 2011 22:07:19 +0200, A. VanValin
meatbyproduct-musicbra...@yahoo.com wrote:
pMaybe with a different separator to distinguish composers from
performers?/p
pAlex / caller#6/p
there seems to be consensus on slash in the less VA-thread
/symphonick
More than 48 hours have passed without any objections, so this has now
passed. I'll add the relationship now.
Nikki
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
Murdos' proposal seems to be universally liked and there's no sense
waiting for a week, so I'm putting it as RFV (with warp's approval).
It
but no release date or label
information).
What are my alternatives?
Regards,
Rob...
P84
__ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature
database 6139 (20110520) __
The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.
http://www.eset.com
symphonick wrote:
Sounds like a Picard issue to me? To be able to select which recording
AR(s) should be used for tagging (regardless of whether you tag from
recording names or release traclist?)
not exactly. i don't want to have to set for every album i tag the
appropriate fields. i
pUnderstood. Sorry, what I meant was something like/p
pComposer1/ composer2 (some other separator) performer1/ performer2/p
pJust a thought. /p
pAlex / caller#6/p
pSorry for the top posting. New phone, inept user/p
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
This is a proposal [1] to allow linking our works to their matching
pages in the Secondhandsongs database.
For those who are not aware of it, it's a database dedicated to cover
songs (and also samples).
It offers interesting information for each work:
- composer, lyricist or writer
-
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 9:47 PM, lorenz pressler l...@gmx.at wrote:
Lauri Watts wrote:
Enough they got their name on the cover.
http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/file/n3539408/bravohits37.jpg
http://imageshack.us/m/703/1612/bravohits37.jpg
i would hate to see 7 or more artists as
28 matches
Mail list logo
