On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 03:45:16 +0200, Ryan Torchia
wrote:
> Obviously there'd be some clean-up to do, but that's true no matter what
> we
> decide. I don't think Classical composers would be that difficult
> (especially if we can do batch editing) -- search for anybody who died
> prior
> to,
On 23 July 2011 11:06, Ryan Torchia wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Nikki wrote:
>>
>> jacobbrett wrote:
>> > I don't mean to set the discussion back, but perhaps an additional field
>> > for
>> > featured artists (and other, non-equal/non-collab. artist credits) could
>> > be
>> >
On 23 July 2011 00:08, Ryan Torchia wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 6:22 AM, Andii Hughes
> wrote:
>>
>> > That's a rather large "except" though, isn't it? That essentially
>> > narrows
>> > down the scope of your sample to title tracks of singles.
>>
>> No, I was primarily thinking of compilat
+1
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Andii Hughes wrote:
> On 23 July 2011 11:06, Ryan Torchia wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Nikki wrote:
> >>
> >> jacobbrett wrote:
> >> > I don't mean to set the discussion back, but perhaps an additional
> field
> >> > for
> >> > feature
On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Ryan Torchia wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Nikki wrote:
>
>> Ryan Torchia wrote:
>>
>
> And because I can't think of anywhere graceful to point this out: if you
> move the featured credit from the track to the an artist credit field, you
> lose the ab
