On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:57 PM, caller#6
wrote:
>
>
> On 01/09/2012 02:01 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
>> I've seen some editors setting, for example, a movement of a sonata to
>> the "sonata" type. That feels wrong to me: that's not a sonata, just
>> part of one. I'd like to know what oth
On 01/09/2012 02:01 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> I've seen some editors setting, for example, a movement of a sonata to
> the "sonata" type. That feels wrong to me: that's not a sonata, just
> part of one. I'd like to know what other editors think though before,
> maybe, sending an RFC
Here it is nikki, I removed all the « must », the « do not » and the « too
many spaces » from the proposal, see hereby the new version.
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:jesus2099/Style/Language/Vietnamese
-
jesus2099 × Ti = Tristan + patate12 ÷ saucisson7
mb : http://musicbrainz.org/user/jesus
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:04 PM, monxton wrote:
> On 02/01/2012 14:31, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
>> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89tude (needed for, say, half the
>> works of Chopin, for example)
>
> Wondering why the name for this type would be in French? Of course in
> your example
On 02/01/2012 14:31, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren wrote:
> See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89tude (needed for, say, half the
> works of Chopin, for example)
Wondering why the name for this type would be in French? Of course in
your example of Chopin they were named in French, but plenty of othe
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
writes:
> I've seen some editors setting, for example, a movement of a sonata to
> the "sonata" type. That feels wrong to me: that's not a sonata, just
> part of one. I'd like to know what other editors think though before,
> maybe, sending an RFC that asks for setting wo
2012/1/9, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren :
> I've seen some editors setting, for example, a movement of a sonata to
> the "sonata" type. That feels wrong to me: that's not a sonata, just
> part of one. I'd like to know what other editors think though before,
> maybe, sending an RFC that asks for setting
I've seen some editors setting, for example, a movement of a sonata to
the "sonata" type. That feels wrong to me: that's not a sonata, just
part of one. I'd like to know what other editors think though before,
maybe, sending an RFC that asks for setting work types only to the
full work and not to i
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symphonic_poem - I've entered a good
amount of these and I'm probably not the only one, and none of the
current types are correct for it.
--
Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren
___
MusicBrainz-style mailing list
MusicBrainz-style
