On 03/06/2012 12:05 AM, practik wrote:
> I think picking the right join phrases is the key to preventing confusion
> here. The potential trouble spots I see are "partial medley of" and "cover
> medley of," because the attributes would seem to apply to the entire medley,
> though really they only a
2012/3/8 Frederic Da Vitoria
> 2012/3/8 symphonick
>
>> 2012/3/8 Frederic Da Vitoria
>>
>>> What about
>>> http://musicbrainz.org/release/141064ea-90e7-3c96-987b-686e3c3bee72/relationships,
>>> how should it be reformated? Ravel/Debussy/Fauré: String quartets? Of
>>> course it could be underst
2012/3/8 symphonick
> 2012/3/8 Frederic Da Vitoria
>
>> What about
>> http://musicbrainz.org/release/141064ea-90e7-3c96-987b-686e3c3bee72/relationships,
>> how should it be reformated? Ravel/Debussy/Fauré: String quartets? Of
>> course it could be understood as Fauré String quartets and unspeci
2012/3/8 Frederic Da Vitoria
> What about
> http://musicbrainz.org/release/141064ea-90e7-3c96-987b-686e3c3bee72/relationships,
> how should it be reformated? Ravel/Debussy/Fauré: String quartets? Of
> course it could be understood as Fauré String quartets and unspecified
> works by Ravel and Deb
